Previous Page  22 / 294 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 294 Next Page
Page Background

EUROPEAN SECTION

Young Solicitors' Seminar, Wexford

More than 200 members attended a very successful

Seminar which was organised jointly by the Society of

Young Solicitors, and the Provincial Solicitors Associa-

tion, which was held in the Talbot Hotel, Wexford, on

Saturday 6th and Sunday 7th November.

Tlie relevant topic chosen was "Solicitors in Europe".

Mr. Fintan O'Connor, Chairman of the Wexford Bar

Association, first welcomed the guests, the distinguished

speakers, and the President of the Law Society, Mr.

McGrath.

The first paper was given by Mr. Stanley Crossick,

u

et

,

ary of

'he English Solicitors European Group,

on "Common Market Entry"—the effect on domestic

a

w and the implications for the legal profession.

Mr. Crossick first mentioned that there was some

controversy as to whether English or French should be

f p

W O r k i n g l a n

S

u a

S

e of t h e

Community. The Treaty

Rome was a framework where the legislative powers

resided jointly in the Council of Ministers and in the

omniission, whereas the administrative powers resided

resided jointly in the Commission and in the Council of

Ministers, whereas the administrative powers resided

. language. It was to be noted, however, that no

administrative enforcement machinery had been de-

vised. The European Community was essentially a

ureaucracy; the effect of this was that Community

e

gislation was rarely hastily thought out; there was

plenty of dialogue between the Commission and other

institutions, and amongst the sections of the Com-

mission itself. The European Parliament was the

jyeakest institution in the fabric, although it could in

neory dismiss the Commission by a two thirds majority

averse vote; it was in practice, however, merely a

consultative assembly.

Regulations issued by the Commission are directly

cnective throughout the Community whereas Directives

a

Y

e 0nl

V effective when they have been implemented by

e

respective national Parliaments of the Member

states. By Article 177, the highest Court of a member

,

a t e

must refer any questions affecting the construction

ot any

p a r t Q

f

Treaty of Rome and associated

ocunients for a ruling to the European Court in

uxemburg. Article 2 sets out clearly the aims of the

ommunity. It was clear that the pure domestic law of

l a

6

K

r

w a s

largely unaffected by Community

w

J

but there would be some changes in laws affecting

ustoms duties, movement of labour, agriculture,

transport, and taxation.

aff -

rC w o u

^ be substantial innovations in the laws

fr

C

j

tln

®

res

'rictive practices and monopolies. As regards

^

e

edom of services and of persons, the Treaty abolished

r e

0 a d

Jy all discriminations based on nationality. As

jgards the free movement of capital, little progress had

j.

ei

?

m a

d e in the negotiations so far. The Sterling

change Area will have to be reorganised. The benefits

1Sln

S °ut of the laws of employment and of social

ecurity and of labour law, will be freely transferable

junongst Member States. A Common Road-Rail Policy

* been formulated in transport, but negotiations are

' very advanced. The Coir munity regulations giving

a guarantee that road transport workers will be protected

against unfair competition are stringent.

Over one thousand regulations affecting different

agricultural products had been issued by the Com-

mission. It would seem that the methods of financing

Irish agriculture would not be approved by the Com-

munity. Discussions were still in progress about fishery

limits, but the control of the quality and standard of

foods was far more stringent than now.

There had not been much progress to report in the

harmonisation of laws contemplated by Article 100 of

the Treaty. However an important Convention on the

Recognition and Enforcement of Judgments amongst

Member States had been concluded. It was intended to

standardise bankruptcy and winding up proceedings.

The European Company had been proposed for larger

units, but the Dunlop-Pirelli case illustrated the restric-

tions imposed by the present law. Mergers and amal-

gamations appeared to be limited by fiscal problems.

The added value tax system had to be introduced in

all member states, but the rates need not be standardised.

With regard to the problem of the incorporation of

Community law into Irish law, it was necessary to

stress that the whole Community law would have to be

accepted in toto, including all Regulations in force.

The new member states will have to sign a short

accession treaty; but it would be wise to embody the

Regulations in detail. In any event, in relation to

matters covered by the Treaty of Rome, it was essential

to note that Community law must take precedence

over national law, even though some national Courts

had tried not to subscribe to this principle.

The sovereignty of modern states is in any event

much restricted, and the alleged loss of sovereignty was

more than compensated by belonging to a large trading

partnership for the benefit of all concerned. It was

stressed that no major decision affecting the Community

would be taken save by a unanimous vote of all member

states. The lecturer thought that serious problems of

translation would arise if Irish were to become an

official language.

It was necessary to realise that, upon adhesion to the

Community, new subjects would have to be studied,

and there will be an increase in trade. It should be

stressed that lawyers should not generally as professional

men, regard Community law as being beyond their

scope. Irish legal experts would have to recognise the

difference in law which would affect the entire ap-

proach to national law. For instance the law of agency

would require reconsideration in the light of Contin-

ental practice.

As regards Freedom of Establishment the present

position in England was that foreign lawyers were free

to practise in most branches, provided they do not hold

themselves out to be barristers or solicitors, and do not

draw deeds. In France, one was entitled to practise

as a "Conseiller juridique".

There were severe restrictions upon practice as a

lawyer in Germany, as even German lawyers were con-

fined to practise in their own 17 specified districts.

19