Previous Page  32 / 294 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 32 / 294 Next Page
Page Background

Row over Young Lawyers' Union

in England

Britain's trainee solicitors are in revolt against their

employers. An attempt by them to register as a trade

union under the new Industrial Relations Act has

brought a threat by the Law Society, representing their

employers, that it will stop employing trainees as

"articled clerks", and will stop any help it gives at the

moment to them.

The Law Society's threat is aimed at the clerks'

Associate Members Committee. This represents their

interests within the Law Society, which itself theoreti-

cally represents both solicitors and their clerks.

It also administers the training programme for

articled clerks, runs their qualifying examinations, and

contributes £2,000 a year to help with the committee

members' travelling expenses.

The clerks are also trying to negotiate with local

law societies to persuade individual employers to pay

á decent basic wage to clerks. One society settled on

a rate of between £3 and £5 a week for a beginner.

"That sort of thing is ludicrous," said Rodney King,

chairman of the Associate Members' Committee. "Al-

though, to be fair, some employers pay a reasonable

wage, the trouble is that there are far too many law

graduates, many of them married, working for £7 or

£8 a week."

The decision to register as a trade union was taken

by the 25-strong National Committee which represents

some 9,000 trainee solicitors. The first application for

registration is blocked by a constitutional point, but

the committee think they can overcome this by emend-

ing the constitution.

Last week the situation was complicated by the entry

°n the scene of Clive Jenkins of the ASTMS. The

articled clerks booked a room in the Law Society Hall

and invited him along to tell them how to go about

setting up a trade union. Brandishing a fistful of

successful actions on behalf of solicitors in industry,

Jenkins told them that setting up a trade union was

"an act of faith." This alarmed the Law Society which

suspects Jenkins' intentions.

The official view of the articled clerks' action is that

they are receiving training which will quickly take them

into the upper middle-class earning bracket, and that

until they are trained they are a net liability. The clerks

claim that by carrying out lucrative conveyancing work

for their employers they make a profit for their offices.

The threat to withdraw the Law Society's help was

given by William Brown, chairman of its Education

and Training Committee at a later meeting with the

clerks.

Dennis Gordon, secretary of Holborn Law Society,

Britain's largest local group, said : "This trade union

issue is not very real. If they set their sights too high

they will price themselves out of the market and the

future training of the legal profession in this country

will break down because solicitors will not be able to

afford clerks.

"It is true that the clerks doing conveyancing are

engaged in profitable work, but no self-respecting solici-

tor uses his clerk purely for conveyancing. They are

given a legal training and that is what costs the money.

"In my own area office rents are £6 a sq. ft. That is

enough space to stand your waste paper basket in.

Articled clerks take up more space, of course, and they

cost money for additional services. These are the sort

of factors that ought to be looked at."

(,Sunday Telegraph,

12th December 1971)

FIRST IRISH EXAMINATION

In the November 1971

Gazette

, at page 152 of volume

65, amongst candidates who passed the First Irish

Examination in September 1971 the following is the

correct name of the following candidate: Martin,

Celine Mary.

The following additional candidate should also have

been inserted : Meagher, Aideen Mary.

29