Previous Page  37 / 294 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 37 / 294 Next Page
Page Background

Proceedings of the Council

THE SOCIETY

16 DECEMBER 1971

Mr. McGrath and afterwards Mr. O'Donovan in the

chair also present, Messrs W. B. Allen, Walter Beatty,

Bruce Blake, John Carrigan, Anthony Collins, Laurence

Cullen, Gerard M. Doyle, Joseph Dundon, Thomas J.

Fitzpatrick, James R. C. Green, Christopher Hogan,

Michael P. Houlihan, Nicholas S. Hughes, John B.

Jermyn, Francis Lanigan, Eunan McCarron, Patrick J.

McEllin, Patrick McEntee, John Maher, Gerald J.

Moloney, Patrick C. Moore, Senator J. J. Nash, George

A. Nolan, Patrick Noonan, John G. O'Carroll, Peter E.

O'Connell, Rory O'Connor, Thomas V. O'Connor,

Patrick F. O'Donnell, John O'Meara, William A.

Osborne, David R. Pigot, Peter D. M. Prentice, Mrs.

Moya Quinlan, Robert McD. Taylor, Ralph J. Walker.

The following was among the business transacted.

Taxing Masters' Offices.

The Council passed the following resolution.

While appreciating the need for allocating any

available space in the Four Courts to the best

advantage the Council of the Incorporated Law

Society of Ireland deprecate the undignified treat-

ment to which the Taxing Masters of the High

Court were recently subjected by the Department

of Justice when possession was taken of their

offices. The Council feel that had the matter been

referred to the Chief Justice under whose juris-

diction the Taxing Masters serve it would have

been readily resolved to the satisfaction of all

parties.

Prices Bill 1971

A report circulated by the Secretary was considered

followed by a general discussion. It was decided that

the President with a deputation should seek an inter-

view with the Minister for Industry and Commerce

and if advised with the Minister for Justice to make

representation against the application of the existing

Prices legislation to solicitors' charges which are already

subject to statutory control.

Pending applications for increases in legal remuneration

It was reported to the Council that the statutory

body under the Solicitors Remuneration Act 1881 had

received a communication from the Minister for Justice

asking them to reconsider the increase of 42% on

Schedule 2 made by the Solicitors Remuneration General

Order 1971. This order must lie before the Oireachtas

for a period of one month before it can become effec-

tive. It was decided that the President and Secretary

should attend the next meeting of the Statutory body

to submit the views of the Society against the request

made by the Department. It was also reported to the

Council that the Circuit and District Courts Rules

Committees had received a communication from the

Department of Justice asking them to reconsider the

orders which they had made and to substitute an in-

crease of 20% for the amounts already included in the

rules. It was decided that representations should be

made to the Council by the Society to these committees

pointing out that the increase of 42% barely covers the

increase in the cost of living since 1964 and that in the

case of the Circuit Court it is considerably less than

the increase in the cost of living since the present scale

of costs was prescribéd in 1961.

13 JANUARY 1972

The President in the chair, also present Messrs W.

B. Allen, Walter Beatty, Bruce Blake, John Carrigan,

Anthony E. Collins, Laurence Cullen, Gerard M. Doyle,

James R. C. Green, Gerald Hickey, Thomas Jackson,

John B. Jermyn, Francis Lanigan, Eunan McCarron,

Patrick McEntee, Brandan A. McGrath, John Maher,

Patrick G. Moore, Senator John J. Nash, Patrick

Noonan, John C. O'Carroll, Peter E. O'Connell, Rory

O'Connor, Thomas V. O'Connor, Patrick F. O'Donnell,

William A. Osborne, David R. Pigot, Peter D. M.

Prentice and Robert McD. Taylor.

The following was among the business transacted.

Legal aid—change of solicitor

The Council expressed the following opinion.

Where a solicitor is assigned a legal aid matter

another solicitor should not accept a retainer from

•the client until the first solicitor's assignment has been

discharged. The accused has a right to retain another

solicitor and is not deprived of that right by the legal

aid assignment. It appears to the Council that a solici-

tor assigned in a legal aid case is not entitled to costs

under the legal aid scheme until evidence has been

taken and until the case has been concluded. If costs

are legally payable in a legal aid case to a solicitor

assigned under the Act a solicitor should not accept

a retainer on a change of solicitor until a certificate for

payment of the original solicitor's costs has been issued.

Change of solicitor—general rule

As a matter of professional etiquette a solicitor who

has been requested to accept a retainer in a matter in

which a colleague has already been retained and whose

retainer is being discharged should obtain the client's

instructions and agreement to notifying the colleague

of the change and should thereupon notify the colleague

reserving his rights to act in the matter having regard

to the circumstances of the case and the interests of

justice. This opinion is issued as supplemental to

opinion DR 22 (1) in the Members' Handbook 1968

edition.

34