EDITORIAL
Constitutional Implications of the Third
Amendment Bill
The Third Amendment to the Constitution Bill enables
the State to accede to the Treaties relating to (1) The
European Economic Community; (2) The European
Coal and Steel Community; and (3) The European
Atomic Energy Committee. This is in the form of an
additional sub-section to Article 29, which relates to
international relations. The final sentence of the amend-
ment reads : "No provisions of this Constitution invali-
dates laws enacted, acts done or measures adopted by
the State necessitated by the obligations of membership
of the Communities, or institutions thereof, from having
the force of the law in the State."
It was already pointed out in the January
Gazette
that it was unwise to substitute a wide omnibus amend-
ment to replace specific amendments relating for in-
stance to the powers of the Oireachtas and of the
Supreme Court. It was also stressed that fundamental
rights should be specifically protected. This appears to
be reinforced bv the Irish version of Article 46 of the
Constitution, which suggests that the Constitution can
be amended only disjunctively, either by variation or
bv addition, or by repeal in respect of each amendment.
The First Amendment to the Constitution Act, 1939,
which was specifically passed to protect our status of
neutrality in time of war, specifically amended the
definition of "time of war". In the Schedule to the
Second Amendment to the Constitution Act, 1941, each
deletion or variation was specifically referred to by
reference number. It is difficult to see why these prece-
dents were not adhered to in this instance as it is quite
clear that by way of a simple explanatory memorandum
the average voter would be in a position to grasp the
effect of each separate amendment. An interpretation
by the Supreme Court would appear to be desirable
particularly as the issue has never been ruled on.
It is known that, by virtue of Article 235 of the
Treaty of Rome, the Council of Ministers are given
the right to enact any legislation necessary to achieve
the aim of economic harmony under the Treaty. It may
be thought that no legislation detrimental to Irish
interests could be passed, in view of the fact that the
Ministers have to be unanimous, but it is well known
that pressures can be brought against recalcitrant Minis-
ters. Whether one is a protagonist or an antagonist of
the Community, constitutional propriety demands that
each amendment necessary to enable us to enter the
Community should be clearly and unequivocally spelled
out.
Legal Protection of Detainees
The absolute independence of the Judiciary in Northern
Ireland has been amply demonstrated recently. Not
only has Judge Conaghan awarded the maximum
amount within his jurisdiction to a detainee for brutal
ill-treatment by the authorities, but also the Northern
Court of Appeal in (
R
)
Hume v Attorney-General
has
unanimously found a vital regulation unconstitutional.
There it was held that the British Army as "security
forces" could not legally be included in the term "Com-
missioned officers of Her Majesty's Forces" in Regula-
tion 38 (1) issued under the Civil Authorities (Special
Powers) Acts which authorise the police to quell a
riotous assembly on the ground that the Regulation
infringed the Government of Ireland Act, 1920, as that
Act gave no power to the Northern Ireland Parliament
to make anv regulations concerning the British Army.
The effect of this judgment was that John Hume and
others had been improperly convicted of riotous assem-
bly in Derry and that their convictions were subse-
quently quashed.
However, by having the Northern
Ireland
Act, 1972, passed in a few hours, the British Govern-
ment tried to set at naught the effect of this judgment.
As Mr. Boyle has shown, it is doubtful whether this
legislation is valid, particularly as it purported to
amend the Government of Ireland Act, 1920. Professor
Pallev has shown the enormous powers wfiich the Stor-
mont Parliament now possesses over the British Army-
Let us hope that this outrageous legislation will also
be found invalid soon.
Note
—This Editorial was written before Mr. Heath
announced the imposition of direct rule upon Northern
Ireland on March 24th.
66




