Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  34 / 274 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 34 / 274 Next Page
Page Background

that OMB withdraw its approval of the modification pending development of standard method 

performance requirements and further investigation.  Hill explained the international implications 

of the OMB having approved the modification.  Sullivan explained that CODEX will downgrade the 

AOAC modified method which is perceived to cast a negative light on AOAC and other methods to 

be considered within CODEX.   

While there is no precedent for this, there was no opinion by the AOAC Board of Directors on the 

scientific validity of the modified Official Method, but rather, withdrawing the approval of the 

modification represents “taking a step back” due to lack of adequate procedures and potential 

negative perception of AOAC methods by other international organizations that incorporate 

AOAC methods.   

MOTION:

  For OMB to withdraw the approval of the modifications to First Action Official Methods 

of Analysis, AOAC 2009.01 and AOAC 2011.25, pending further investigation.   

Abbott moved and Cook seconded.   Consensus: unanimously in favor. 

ACTIONS:   

McKenzie to arrange a teleconference with method author within the next day to inform 

him of decision. 

Notification will follow in AOAC Inside Laboratory Management magazine and revising the 

OMA will follow the teleconference with the method author. 

b.

Alternative Approaches to Determining Reproducibility – Developing a “Best Practices” 

statistics monograph 

Hill explained that the a white paper, a best practices document, is being put together for 

delivery to the Interagency Meeting  at Codex in February.   The document is a layman’s 

version of the statistical documents detailing alternative options for determination of 

reproducibility.  Hill explained that a working group was formed to participate in this 

effort that includes, Robert LaBudde, Paul Wehling, Sidney Sudberg, and Norma Hill. From 

OMB both Graves (Chair of the Committee on Statistics) and Tom Phillips also agreed to 

participate.   

Hill explained that the document will be preliminary and that Wehling would start the 

document and that it would be presented to the Committee on Statistics and the OMB for 

their approval. 

ACTIONS: 

Hill to hold preliminary with the group to get things started on Friday, January 9, 

2015. 

Wehling to develop a draft of the preliminary document, ideally this document 

could be reviewed by the OMB during their February 2015 meeting.  

III.

UPDATES 

a.

Revised Awards Document 

ACTIONS:  AOAC staff to send out the revised awards document to all OMB members. This 

document will be discussed at the February 2015 OMB meeting. 

b.

Upcoming In‐Person Meetings 

McKenzie provided an update on the upcoming meetings including the February SPADA meeting, 

the February OMB meeting and the AOAC Mid‐Year Meeting. 

ACTIONS:   

Abbott and Phillips to attend the AOAC SPADA meeting. 

McKenzie to Include the Mid‐Year meeting along with OMB liaisons on the OMB February 

27