Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  61 / 120 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 61 / 120 Next Page
Page Background

MINING FOR CLOSURE

43

risdictions are consistent, clear, transparent, coor-

dinated and efficient for orphaned and abandoned

mines in Canada. A short précis of work in the key

programme areas (summarised from Tremblay

(2005)) is supplied below.

Information Gathering

– The principal objective in

this area is to develop capacity for a national inven-

tory of orphaned and abandoned mine sites based

on compatible inventories from each province and

territory, and including an acceptable system for

categorization and priority ranking.

75,76

Community Involvement

– Work in this area has fo-

cused on the development of a plan to foster commu-

nity involvement in decision-making about closure

and reclamation, and to ensure that targeted end-use

and reclamation standards are acceptable to local

communities. In 2002, case studies related to com-

munity involvement were completed for three Cana-

dian mine sites, along with experiences in commu-

nity involvement at abandoned mines in the United

States were completed (See NOAMI (2003b)). The

“lessons learned” from these studies were developed

into a series of guidelines (11 guiding principles) and

published in the pamphlet “Best Practices in Com-

munity Involvement” (NOAMI, 2003a).

Barriers To Collaboration

– In order to assess barri-

ers to collaboration, a review was undertaken to ex-

amine legislative requirements in Canada and se-

lected other international jurisdictions. The study

addresses regulatory or institutional barriers, liabil-

ity disincentives, and collaborative opportunities

regarding voluntary abatement, remediation, and

reclamation of orphaned/abandoned mines. Par-

ticular emphasis was placed on four approaches:

‘Good Samaritan’ legislation;

77

permit blocking;

allocative versus joint and several responsibil-

ity; and

non-compliance registries.

The final report for this work titled “Barriers to Col-

laboration: Orphaned/Abandoned Mines in Cana-

da” was completed in 2002 (Castrilli, 2002).

Funding Approaches

– As a key output for this work,

a report titled “Potential Funding Approaches for

Orphaned/Abandoned Mines in Canada” (Castrilli,

2003) was prepared. The report outlines variety of

funding approaches to be considered for the clean up

or management of liabilities related to OAMs. Indi-

viduals with expertise in this area were surveyed, and

the report incorporated their views as well as those of

the authors. Advantages and disadvantages of each

approach were evaluated and preferred options were

recommended for consideration by governments.

As part of ongoing work in this area, NOAMI is cur-

rently in the process of organising an “Assessing Lia-

bilities and Funding Workshop” that shall take place

in November 2005 in Ottawa, Canada.

78

Guidelines For Legislative Review

– A study is being

undertaken to address both the broad application of

legislation and policies and the wide spectrum of

regulatory agencies that regulate contaminated sites,

operating mines, and orphaned and abandoned

mine sites in Canada. It involves jurisdictional leg-

islative reviews with respect to collaboration, liability

and funding to ensure that approaches across juris-

dictions are consistent, clear, transparent, coordinat-

ed and efficient for orphaned and abandoned mines

in Canada. These guidelines are intended to provide

a consistent approach to the completion of a review

of legislation (acts and regulations) and related poli-

cies and practices (such as permitting, licensing

and approval processes) that relate to orphaned and

abandoned mine sites as well as contaminated and

operating sites if there is demonstrated relevancy to

legacy issues. The guidelines are set up in the form

of a checklist with associated questions, which will

be completed during the study.

Not least due to their relevance to SEE/TRB juris-

dictions, the sections

Funding Approaches and Bar-

riers to Collaboration

are taken up in Sections 5.1.2

and 5.1.3 as examples.

75. In the Canadian study it was also found that there is a great deal

to be learnt from experiences in the US. Both this study, and an ear-

lier Canadian effort (see Mackasey, W.O. (2000): Abandoned Mines

in Canada.

www.miningwatch.ca/publications/Mackasey_aban-

doned_mines.html) concur that the United States has by far the

most advanced inventories dealing with the abandoned mine issue.

76. The reader should note that the European Union has now also

released guidelines for creating inventories of mine waste sites.

See Appendix B for details of the report EUR21186EN, “Options

for compiling an inventory of mining waste sites throughout Eu-

rope” edited by S. Sommer.

77. Environmental Good Samaritan legislation in the context of

this ENVSEC document refers to legislative measures designed to

encourage volunteer reclamation and water pollution abatement

by the placing of limits on civil and environmental liability. As an

example, such legislation may grant civil and environmental relief

to landowners, persons or watershed groups performing reclama-

tion and other pollution abatement activities on land and water

adversely affected by mining or similar activities.

78. A number of case studies will be featured (i.e. showing how the

funds were available/not available; financial-bonding assurance).

The plan is to have about 75% of the presentations onmethods used

to assess liability and the remaining 25% on funding approaches.