Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  iv / 185 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page iv / 185 Next Page
Page Background

2007 Best Practices Study

2007 Best Practices Study

INTRODUCTION

Since 1993 the annual

Best Practices Study

has served

as a tool to help agency owners and managers

understand how their business operations perform and

measure up to the top performing firms across the

country. It is a “must have” for those agencies that

want to become the best they can be.

The 2007

Best Practices Study

provides critical

performance benchmarks in six agency revenue

categories ranging from

Under $1,250,000

to

Over

$25,000,000.

Agencies can measure, evaluate, and

compare results for agency operations including:

> Income & Expense Distribution

> Revenue & Profitability Growth

> Production & Service Staff

Compensation/Productivity

> Technology Expenses

> P&C and GL&H Carrier Representation

> And much more

This year’s study offers a more comprehensive look at

the 195 agencies selected as the 2007 Best Practices

Agencies. In addition to their financial and

operational results, the study also takes a look at a

variety of management issues including:

> Factors most critical to success

> Top challenges

> Keys for maximizing productivity

> Keys for gaining a competitive advantage

Several new performance benchmarks have been

added including a more detailed breakdown of

revenues and expenses, and the “Rule of 20” score

that indicates whether shareholder value is being

created.

(For more details see below.)

What’s New This Year

Revenue and Expense Breakout

In the past the study has consolidated revenues and

expenses into fairly broad categories making some

comparisons difficult. Factors such as corporate

structure (e.g., C corporation versus S corporation)

further complicated expense comparisons because of

what was or was not reflected on the income

statement.

This year the study provides greater detail for both

revenues and expenses which provides more

meaningful benchmarks for better “apples-to-apples”

comparisons. The new breakdowns include:

Source of Revenues – Bond revenues have been

separated from Commercial P&C commissions & fees

for a more accurate look at P&C sources of revenues.

A new line, Value Added Services, has been added

under both P&C and L&H to show fees derived from

the delivery of such services.

Compensation Expense – Both Payroll and Benefits

have been broken down to provide a better

understanding of the participating agencies’ costs –

what costs are somewhat fixed (payroll taxes) versus

discretionary costs (retirement benefits, insurance,

etc.).

Selling & Operating Expense –These expense

categories now include greater detail, including any

depreciation and amortization expense associated with

the category. This allows for a more accurate picture

of the total expenses incurred as both cash (e.g.

monthly lease payment) and non-cash expenses (e.g.

computer depreciation expense) are captured.

The “Rule of 20” Score

In recent years, Reagan Consulting has developed a

metric called the “Rule of 20” to provide a quick

means of calculating whether or not an agency is

creating significant value for its shareholders. It is the

sum of an agency’s:

Pro forma EBITDA Margin times 50%

PLUS

Organic Revenue Growth Rate

EQUALS

Rule of 20 Outcome