Previous Page  124 / 132 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 124 / 132 Next Page
Page Background

116

The Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland.

[APRIL, 1909

the Land Act of 1903, in which event no fee is

payable; otherwise a fee of

los.

is payable for

a Land Certificate.

The search to ascertain the Folio Number

must in all cases be made in either the Local

or Central Office by the solicitor or his agent,

or other party interested, as the officials do not

undertake such searches.

The fee for a search is

is.,

payable by the

lodgment of a stamped Search Docket, procur

able at the offices.

In case the registered owner be not alive,

the exact date of the death should be notified,

by letter specifying the Folio Number, to the

Central Office, and instructions awaited before

taking any further steps in bespeaking a Certi

ficate.

When everything is

in order, the Land

Certificate will be made out and sent to the

Local Office for counter-signature.

When returned to the Central Office, it will

be

lodged

in the Irish Land Commission

Records (if an annuity be payable), and a

certified copy will be issued by the

latter

Department without charge, or further applica

tion.

In case a copy Map be required, please

communicate with the Central Office, specifying

the Folio Number as above.

Instructions as

to the fee payable will be issued from the

Central Office, with a form of requisition for

Map.

Land Judge's Court.

THE following is the letter referred to in the

Council minutes of the 24th March :—

" High Court of Justice (Ireland),

" Chancery Division, Land Court,

"

i$th March,

1909.

" Sir,—I am directed by the Land Judge

to state, for the information of your Council,

that he has made an Order, authorizing the

Taxing Masters on taxation of costs in this

Court to allow the following revised scale of

charges in respect of advertisements published

in the newspapers, under the direction of the

Court, viz.:—

Per line of single tabular form,

gd.

Per line of double tabular form, is. 6d.

" Nine words to constitute a line, necessary

space to be counted as lines, capitals two lines,

and the concluding line of a paragraph, even

if it does not contain nine words,

to be

counted as a line.

" The order

is

strictly confined to pro

ceedings before the Judge as Land Judge, and

does not affect the scale of charges of the

' General Advertiser.'

"I am, sir, your obedient servant,

" J. M. KENNEDY, Registrar.

"The Secretary,

" Incorporated Law Society of Ireland,

Four Courts."

Recent Decisions affecting Solicitors.

{Notes ofdecisions, whether in reported or unreported

cases, of interest to Solicitors are invited from

Members?}

COURT OF APPEAL (ENGLAND).

(Before the Master of the R

olls, F

letcher

Moulton and Buckley,

L.J

J.)

Attorney-General

v.

Herbert Till.

Feb. 18, 1909.-—

Revenue—Income Tax—State

ment of income—Incorrect statement—-Penalty

—Income Tax Act,

1842

(5 6° 6

Vict.,

c-

35).

s.

15-

A PERSON who has delivered a statement of his

income chargeable with

income tax which,

through negligence or carelessness, but without

fraud, is incorrect, is not liable to the penalty

of ^50 under.section 55 of the Income Tax

Act, 1842.

This was an appeal from a judgment by the

Lord Chief Justice sitting with a special jury,

which raised a question on the construction of

section 55 of the Income Tax Act, 1842. The

question was raised by an information laid by

the Attorney-General against the defendant,

seeking to recover the penalty of ^50 imposed

by section 55 of the Act of 1842 upon a person

who has to render an account of his profits

under Schedule D for the purposes of income

tax, if, as the Crown alleged, he does not make

a true and accurate return. The defendant

was a solicitor practising at Dorchester, and

he had made some yearly returns of his average

net profits which.were admittedly inaccurate.

When

the mistake was discovered by the

Revenue authority, the defendant offered to

pay the difference on the last year's return, but

not for inaccuracies in previous years, which

were statute-barred ;

the Commissioners of

Inland Revenue declined to accept this offer,

with the result that the present information

was laid by the- Attorney-General claiming the

;£s° penalty. At the trial the jury found that