Previous Page  58 / 96 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 58 / 96 Next Page
Page Background

3.0

The state of our roads

3.3

Incident response and variable

message signs

Aside from the headline opinions

on congestion levels, the 2016

Report on Motoring also looked at

drivers’ views on the way in which

highways authorities around the

UK deal with major incidents

on motorways and major roads.

Two-thirds (66%) of motorists agree

that Highways England, the Welsh

Government, Transport NI and

Transport Scotland, in partnership

with the emergency services, do

their best to minimise delays when

major incidents occur. Only 11% of

drivers do not think this is the case.

And drivers largely accept that

incidents and delays are a fact of

life: 86% share the opinion that

major incidents will occur from

time to time and that major hold-

ups are therefore inevitable.

Just under half of those questioned

(48%) agreed that the authorities did

their best to keep them informed of

the reasons for major incidents and

the likely delays as a result, with only

16% disagreeing with this view.

In terms of the variable message signs

now in widespread use on motorways

around the UK, almost two-thirds

of drivers (63%) say they trust the

accuracy of the information regarding

road incidents (19% do not).

Six in 10 (59%) trust the accuracy of

the travel time estimates on such

signs (against 18% who do not), and

69% find these estimates useful

(versus 9% who do not).

Four in 10 (43%) believe the accuracy

of these signs has improved over the

past 12 months, while a very similar

proportion thinks their accuracy has

stayed the same (42%).

58

RAC Report on Motoring 2016