Previous Page  32 / 84 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 32 / 84 Next Page
Page Background

Figure 1:

Simulation of band pass response combing XHF-292M+ with XLF-73+.

Suitability or

Reflectionless Filters for

UWB RF Front End

While UWB technology has shown

much potential, many design

challenges remain in bringing

the technology to a stage of

wider industry adoption and

commercialization. One of those

challenges has been developing RF

filters with a wide enough passband,

flat response over the whole band,

and sufficient selectivity to meet FCC

specifications. Several approaches

have been studied to achieve the

desired response utilizing microstrip

technology [2] [4] [5]. While these

approaches have achieved varying

degrees of success, they each come

with drawbacks. Microstrip UWB

filter designs typically occupy greater

than a square inch of board space

and tend to be costlier than practical

for volume production.

Mini-Circuits’ reflectionless filters

present an attractive alternative to

existing approaches for UWB filters.

Because reflectionless filters absorb

and terminate stopband signals

rather than reflecting them back to

the source, they give designers the

ability to cascade filters in multiple

sections without generating standing

waves due to impedance mismatch

betweenstagesandotherundesirable

effects. This characteristic allows

combination of low pass and high

pass filters to create a bandpass

response, a technique that becomes

useful for the purpose of designing

UWB filters.

In addition to their intrinsic

cascadability, reflectionless filters are

uniquely suited for UWB filter designs

for at least three reasons. First,

reflectionless high pass filters have

broad enough passbands to achieve

the desired bandwidths for UWB;

most other filter technologies do not.

Second, the low pass filters offer

cut-offs that extend high enough in

frequency to achieve 3 dB bandwidths

well above 100%. Finally, the good

impedance match at the band edges

allows multiple filters to be cascaded

in series without causing distortion

of the passband shape, whereas

cascading conventional filters can

often create standing waves between

stages and introduce passband ripple

and phase instability.

Moreover,

while

competing

approaches employ transmission

lines, reflectionless filter topologies

are based on lumped elements and

produced using MMIC technology

resulting in much smaller size, lower

cost, and excellent repeatability,

making them suitable candidates

for volume production. Models are

available in package sizes as small

as 2x2mm and in bare die format for

chip and wire integration.

With these advantages in mind,

this article explores possibilities for

use of reflectionless filters in UWB

filter design. Five case studies

are presented using standard

reflectionless filter models available

off the shelf from Mini-Circuits.

Simulation results and measured

data are presented to illustrate the

various advantages of reflectionless

filters in UWB applications. Finally,

a design is presented that meets

UWB bandwidth requirements and

conforms to the specifications of the

FCC spectral mask.

Case 1: General Proof of

Concept

To illustrate the technique, two

reflectionless filters were combined to

create a bandpass response. In this

case, high pass model XHF-292M+ and

low pass model XLF-73+ were used.

The preliminary simulation shown

in figure 1 exhibits a 3 dB passband

from 2.3 to 9.7 GHz (4.2:1 or 123%

bandwidth).

To validate these results, the filters

were mounted on a test board as shown

in figure 2. Insertion loss and input /

output return loss were swept from 0.1

to 40 GHz and again from 45 MHz to

2 GHz, the later with fine resolution to

capture the low frequency details. The

measurement was then corrected for

the fixture by subtracting the measured

loss of a straight thru-line.

The measured data for this filter is

plotted in figure 3, with insertion

loss in black. The response confirms

the simulation results, exhibiting a 3

dB bandwidth of roughly 2.4 to 9.7

GHz (121% or 4:1). As expected,

cascading the units shows no effect

on the flatness of the passband.

The higher rejection on the low end

is due to the two-section design of

32 l New-Tech Magazine Europe