Previous Page  3 / 12 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 3 / 12 Next Page
Page Background

OPINIONS

Appleton, Wisconsin February 2017 Volume XXII

Issue IV Page 3

Having the end of the term

two weeks after winter break

obviates the utility of an ad-

ministratively scheduled

break; a bit like how drinking

a can of soda thirty minutes

after you brush your teeth is

counterproductive to dental

health.

Most of the discussion

around the timing of finals

relative to winter break usu-

ally centers around its impact

on test-taking. Everyone has

his or her own philosophy; for

every student who prefers to

relax on break without a week

of testing looming on the ho-

rizon, to “get it over with” so

to speak, there is another who

sees winter break as an oppor-

tunity to prepare for his or her

tests. In this respect, the entire

discussion is moot because it

collapses into a clash of per-

sonal tastes.

However, it would be naive

and reductionist to analyze

this issue through the narrow

framework of grade optimiza-

tion. Winter break is a cultur-

al institution more so than it is

an academic one.

The weeks leading up to and

including the start of the new

calendar year are recognized

and celebrated by almost all

cultures across the globe, al-

beit each in their own differ-

ent ways.

Celebration of the new year

dates back to the Babylonians

around 4000 BCE, and thou-

sands of years of tradition

exist around the celebration

of the winter solstice, as can

be seen through the dates of

such holidays as Christmas,

Hanukkah, and Kwanzaa.

Winter break exists so that

we can take time to observe

this most integral and historic

part of our humanity: our cul-

ture.

Final tests have no such

tradition. To say that winter

break is a good time to review

for finals is literally an insult,

however microscopic, to the

human experience as it is un-

derstood everywhere.

Cynics may dissent, how-

ever. They will say that edu-

cation and learning are acul-

tural, and to draw upon the

power of culture in the dis-

cussion of academic terms is

thus antithetical to education

and learning.

However, this cynicism

inevitably collapses on it-

self, because the production

of knowledge is only useful

insofar as it improves the hu-

man experience. If final tests

are allowed to invade the cel-

ebration of the New Year (or

other associated holidays),

they become a barrier to our

ability to fundamentally en-

joy our lives during a time

when we should enjoy them

the most. This would be an

unfortunate oversight in our

learning experience.

I do not know who decides

when the term dates are, but

whoever you are, I entreat you

to let students and educators

maximize their enjoyment of

winter break by ending the

term before it starts, however

possible. I cannot imagine a

scenario where those two ex-

tra weeks make so much of a

difference.

First semester finals should be scheduled before winter break

Noctiluca

Editorial

Social media has become

increasingly integrated into so-

ciety, which is simultaneously

a bane and a blessing. Objec-

tively speaking, there has not

been a time when communica-

tion on a scale this grand could

be as efficiently accomplished;

the potential to perpetually

learn has never been as ac-

cessible. It is through online

communication that most in-

dividuals receive their daily

dosage of news; how else can

you obtain viable information

regarding, say, Syrian refugee

health or ethnic crises in South

Sudan?

State, national and global

news highlight the condition of

society and illuminate the areas

for progressive reform. (Simi-

larly, how can a patient address

her illness if she is uninformed

about its strengths and weak-

nesses?) So misleading propa-

ganda must be avoided at all

costs. As a society founded on

progressive values, we must

be conscientious of fake news

and alternative facts and sift

through proclaimed “facts” to

discover the concrete and justi-

fiable realities of our world “in

order to form a more perfect

union.”

Fake news has been procured

with diverse intentions which

primarily include: illuminating

the malleability of opinions,

gaining monetary benefits or

fueling partisan divides. An

interview conducted by NPR

provided the inside story of

Justin Coler, a fake news pro-

ducer, which explained his

rationale behind promoting

fake news. His objective was

to portray how quickly false

news could spread. In ten

days, one of his pseudo-news

pieces obtained over 1.6 mil-

lion views. He commented to

NPR, “The people wanted to

hear this. So all it took was to

write that story,” exemplify-

ing the current polarization of

American politics. Through

ad views on his pages, Coler

made anywhere from $10,000

to $30,000 a month, which

highlights the concern for the

influence of economic prof-

its on the production of fake

news. Likewise, Coler, who

claims the monetary benefits

do not influence his participa-

tion in this industry, believes

the economic incentive would

encourage money-seekers to

produce fake news.

Unfortunately, fake news is

not the only misleading infor-

mation propagated; alternative

facts are frequently spewed

from the mouths of current

government officials. With

President Trump’s rampant

claims that objective news

sources have become biased

falsehoods, legitimate news re-

porting is now being demeaned

and disregarded. Instead of

looking to well-established

and independent news (which

fights to inform and empower

every man and woman), Presi-

dent Trump demands that the

American people have ears

only for his words. There is no

call more dangerous. And the

justification for officials’ alter-

native facts is unprecedented;

projecting objectively false

information to the American

people as a sort of truth enables

the government to continue to

procure misinformation while

officials carry out different ac-

tions. We cannot simply trust

the word of one man. We must

perpetually search for truth in

news and support independent

journalism.

This predicament surround-

ing the promotion of mis-

leading propaganda must be

eradicated. Recent political de-

cisions, discussions, opinions

and actions have been heav-

ily influenced by this misin-

formation, particularly during

the presidential election and

President Trump’s inaugura-

tion. In order to develop well-

informed opinions and gain re-

alistic comprehensions of the

state of American society, we

must learn to sift through the

pseudo facts and identify val-

id sources. This is easier said

than done. How can you pin-

point who is providing the hard

facts, who is incorporating bias

into their reporting or who is

simply procuring false infor-

mation and presenting it as re-

liable news coverage? At first

glance, it is difficult to come

to a solidified conclusion, but

if you take the time and read

articles published from both

political perspectives, objec-

tive facts can be obtained. Of

course, it is never exactly en-

joyable when perusing through

the opposing viewpoint. But

is that not one of society’s is-

sues, as well? Polarization

has become rampant within

America and has increased the

vulnerability of people with

rigid political categorizations.

We need to be more tolerant of

diverse thought because (if we

value theAmerican institutions

of our rights to the freedom of

speech) everyone is entitled to

their own opinion and it chal-

lenges us personally to be more

conscientious of our individual

rationales.

Moreover, our beliefs must

monitored as we read news; we

must be conscientious of our

inherent biases. Material that

aligns with our opinions may

not be correct, but we could

easily be manipulated into be-

lieving misinformation simply

because it supports an idea we

support. Think about this: it is

significantly easier to believe

your cat broke your lamp if

you are a dog person and have

developed a closer connection

with your dog. We must re-

main conscientious of our per-

sonal and implicit biases as we

strive for a progressive society.

We must eradicate fake news,

discourage alternative facts

and seek objective information

in an effort to establish rights

for all.

By Mac Bagwell

Social media communication mediums, such as Twitter, are

propagating fake news.

Photo illustration by Maeve Salm

Misleading news propaganda must be eliminated

Communion must

be the focus of

intermissions

Zoe Throop and Lexi Tierney study for their AP Physics and AP

Psychology finals. It would be more advantageous to schedule

finals prior to break than after as it would allow students to enjoy

needed relaxation.

Photo illustration by Maeve Salm

People must

avoid fake news

and alternative

facts