Previous Page  143 / 462 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 143 / 462 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

N

N

C 0 R R E S P 0

D E

C E

APRIL 1992

The Editor,

Gazette

Sexist Forms of Address

Dear Editor,

I write to the

Gazette

as the forum

of last resort concerning a certain

phenomenon which I encounter from

time to time in dealing with some of

my professional colleagues. I am a

solicitor practising in the Dublin area

and occasionally, in the day to day

contact with some of my male

colleagues, I find that I am often

addressed by them as "love",

"dear", even "good girl" in the

course of mutual professional

dealings. In my experience these

terms of reference are used

exclusively as a form of deliberate

diminution of my equal professional

status. This is quite apparent from

the manner in which these terms are

inserted, either in consultation

(sometimes in the presence of

clients), or in telephone

conversation. I stress that these

terms of reference are employed by

both young and not so young alike.

Through the good offices of the

Gazette,

I would like to bring to the

attention of these offending solicitors

and to the members of the

profession as a whole that such

offensive and objectionable attitudes

in the conduct of professional affairs

are wholly inadequate and totally

unacceptable and as such require

immediate elimination. They are

damaging not only to the much

maligned image of the profession

itself, but more importantly they

have the propensity to interfere in

clients' affairs to the detriment of

the general public seeking a

professional service. I therefore take

this opportunity in exhorting your

readers to guard against such

prevailing and, at times, deeply

ingrained, sexist attitudes and not

to dismiss my contribution as one of

exaggerated hysteria.

I should add that this concern is one

which is shared by a number of my

colleagues and is not born of an

isolated incident.

I supply you herewith with my name

and address. I would rather that you

withold these as I fear that a certain

section of the profession has not

realised sufficient maturity to accept

what I say in the spirit in which it is

intended, namely, for improved

professional relations and respect for

all colleagues irrespective of their

sex.

Yours etc.,

(Name and address with editor).

Re: Proposed abolition of Irish

language requirement for solicitors.

The Editor,

The Gazette

Sir,

I was rather surprised to note in the

Gazette

(Viewpoint, Jan/Feb 1992)

that the Law Society has been urging

the Government to alter the law

relating to the requirement that those

seeking admission as solicitors or

barristers should as a matter of law

pass an examination in the Irish

language before they can be admitted.

I have not been aware of any great

pressure in the profession relating to

a change concerning this situation

nor indeed have I been aware of the

fact that the Society has decided to

make a decision to go on record as

being opposed to the present legal

situation.

I would of course agree with the

general tenor of the article which is

to the effect that only lip service has

been paid to the Irish language by

Government etc. but I do feel the

following points should be borne in

mind.

Firstly, the standard of Irish required

for the Society exams is not an

exacting standard and I do think

that it would be a very

unsatisfactory situation if learned

members of our profession are going

to be incapable of pronouncing or

understanding even the local place

names in their own country!

It is true to say that the legal

requirement is discriminatory and no

doubt if Government were serious

about the Irish language they would

provide adequate services at every

level in the language and all persons

dealing with the public would be

required to have a knowledge of the

language.

At a time when we are drawing

closer to our European partners

where almost all countries in the EC

have bilingual situations it seems in

my view to be a retrograde step for

the Society to adopt the position

which it is adopting in this case.

Yours etc.,

Tom O'Donnell

15 Mary St., Galway

The Editor,

Gazette

Sir,

I refer to your recent editorial in

relation to the necessity of sitting the

first and second Irish examinations.

I would like to make the following

points:-

a) I presume that the purpose of the

Irish examinations is to test the

119