Previous Page  184 / 462 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 184 / 462 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JUNE

1992

I would welcome such a development

in Ireland as my experience of

libraries and educational institutions

in Ireland is of widespread, if

unintentional, disregard of the laws

of copyright. Photocopying of

literary dramatic and musical work is

common and off air recordings of

radio and television a regular

occurrence. I would hasten to add

that these are personal impressions

of the position in Ireland and I have

no doubt that Mr. Fitzpatrick and

his fellow librarians in the United

Kingdom are scrupulous in their

adherence to the rules of copyright.

Mr. Fitzpatrick would be right in my

view to deduce a more lax attitude

in Ireland than in the United

Kingdom from the deletion of most

of Section 7 of the 1956 Act from

the 1963 Act and to that extent I

acknowledge with gratitude the point

he makes. However, the position as

to the photocopying for research,

private study, criticism and review

was covered generally by the fair

dealings provisions of Section 12 of

the 1963 Act. I would not regard the

difference between the two Acts as

"substantial".

On a personal note Hugh and I were

at school together and it was good

to hear from him albeit in this

circuitous way.

Yours etc.,

James J. Hickey,

Amorys,

1 Fitzwilliam Square.

Compensation Fund

Dear Editor,

I refer to the President's message

"Compensation for Claims or

Licence to Steal" in

Gazette

Volume

86 No. 2 March, 1992.

I specifically refer to the comparison

in that article between the current

Compensation Fund contribution of

£475.00 for an Irish solicitor and the

New York equivalent of $360.00,

which figure I assume is correct.

Given the difference in salaries and

earning potential between the two

jurisdictions referred to, it is clear

that an Irish solicitor is paying

proportionately a much higher figure

than his New York counterpart,

probably in excess of 400% more.

It is, I feel, a sad reflection on both

the Law Society and the members of

the profession that the contribution

of each solicitor to the

Compensation Fund has been

allowed reach its current level, a level

which in the context of the above

example is clearly far too high.

I would be obliged to know whether

the detailed submissions made by the

Law Society to the Minister for

Justice, Padraig Flynn, on the

Solicitors (Amendment) Bill, 1991,

seek to reduce the annual

Compensation Fund contribution for

each Solicitor. While there may be

an argument in favour of

maintaining the Compensation Fund

in that it may be good for the image

of the profession, the current annual

contribution of £475.00 per solicitor

is grossly excessive and far too high

a price to pay for the very limited

credibility the Compensation Fund in

itself gives to the profession.

I would also like to place on record

my own view which is this: if the

annual contribution to the

Compensation Fund cannot be

reduced to a reasonable level of say

£150.00, the Law Society should seek

legislative change to bring about the

entire abolition of the Fund.

I do not know if this is the attitude

of other members of the profession,

but I would certainly be interested to

know.

Meanwhile, the Solicitors Bill seeks

to extend the provision of probate

and conveyancing services to banks,

and to prohibit charging of

percentage fees by Solicitors.

Yours etc.,

Philip Smith,

W.J. Shannon & Co.,

19 Upper Ormond Quay.

Drunken Driving Penalties

Dear Editor,

Enclosed is a copy of a report of

drunken driving which appeared in

the Nenagh Guardian newspaper 100

year ago. Perhaps the penalties for

drunken driving today are not as

severe as we had thought!

I thought the report might be of

interest to your members.

Yours etc.,

Brendan F. Hyland

B. Hyland & Company

"Jailed for being drunk

Sgt. McGann of Timoney, at Roscrea

Petty Sessions, charged William

Maher, a respectable farmer from

Ballykelly, with being drunk on the

public road at Knock, on the 24th

while in charge of an ass and cart.

Mr. Anthony Nolan, solr., Nenagh

appeared for the defence.

The sergeant stated that on the day

in question, he and Constable

Hennessy were on duty and that he

found Maher drunk in charge of the

ass and cart.

Mr. Quinlan, licenced publican,

Knock, stated that Maher was in the

house, he had a couple of pints of

beer, but he was not drunk, although

he did not give him any more.

The magistrates sentenced defendant

to one month's imprisonment in

Clonmel Jail with hard labour."

YOUR WILL

can help

Irish Wheelchair Association

For donations and further particulars contact:

Miriam McNally

Irish Wheelchair Association

Áras Chuchulain, Blackheath Drive,

Clontarf. Dublin 3. Tel: 338241

IRISH

***

WHEELCHAIR

ASSOCIATION

160