Previous Page  29 / 462 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 29 / 462 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

will now be notifiable to the

Minister for Industry and Com-

merce under the 1978 Act where

it results in the acquiring company

obtaining more than 2 5% of the

voting rights in another company;

previously, the threshold was 30%.

The Competition Act also intro-

duces a number of amendments to

procedures under the 1978 Act.

In addition, there is the possibility

that mergers and acquisitions,

including those which are notifiable

under the 1978 Act, might be con-

tested in the Courts on the basis of

Sections 4 and 5 of the Competition

Act. The relationship between the

t wo Acts is not clear and this issue

may not be fully resolved until

t es t ed in t he Courts. In the

meantime, lawyers will have to con-

sider the possibility that a tran-

saction, even one which is approved

by the Minister under the 1978 Act,

may be contested by a third party

in the courts. For example, the

acquisition of a minority share-

holding in a competitor may fall

within Section 4 (1) of the Act

whilst the acquisition of one com-

pany by another company which is

already in a dominant position may

raise issues under Section 5 of the

Act.

Comment

The Competition Act represents a

major development in Irish Law.

Traditionally, the market place in

Ireland has been regulated by law

to only a limited extent. This legis-

lative environment can only have

encouraged practices wh i ch may

now need to be reviewed in the

context of the new legislation.

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1992

As to the likely application of the

competition rules, companies will

need to ensure that their agree-

ments and practices comply w i th

Sections 4 and 5 of the Act. At the

same time, companies can rely

upon the new legislation in order to

compete w i th their competitors.

For example, a new entrant to a

market dominated by one particular

company may use Section 5 in

an attempt to open up the market.

It has to be said, however, that the

lack of enforcement powers on the

part of the Competition Authority

may seriously unde rmi ne t he

effectiveness of the new legisla-

tion. Given the costs and time

constraints involved in High Court

litigation, the policy of enforcement

through the Courts may prove to be

ineffective. Experience at the EC

level might also suggest so. That

said, Irish business has entered a

new legislative era and companies

will need to ensure that they not

only comply w i th the new law but

also use it to their advantage where

appropriate.

"It has to be said, however,

that the lack of

enforcement

powers

on the part of the Competition

Authority

may

seriously

undermine

the effectiveness

of the

new

legislation"

"Did anyone get it?"

When you can't afford to miss a single word, anytime,

anywhere, trust the quality of a portable dictating machine

from Dictaphone the first name in dictation.

The last word every time.

D/C TA PHONE

D/O

For more information on

the new Dictaphone portable

dictating machine, Desktop or

Digital Dictating Systems,

please dial 100 and ask for

FREEFONE DICTAPHONE.

=p Dictaphone

A Pitnev Bowes Company

Dictaphone Company Limited,

Loughlinstown Drive, Dunlaoghaire, Co. Dublin. Tel: 01 2825222

10