Previous Page  34 / 462 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 34 / 462 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1992

or of limited education or powers of

expression, the isolation f r om

friends and the strange surround-

ings coupled with the loss of liberty

can readily tilt the balance of

fairness against him. To cope w i th

persistent questioning requires

exceptional faculties. The dominant

matter in the mind of such a person

must be to regain freedom as soon

as possible, w i t h a s t r ong

temptation to say or sign whatever

it is felt will achieve speedy release.

This temptation becomes com-

pelling where the suspect may be

suffering from drug withdrawal

symptoms". Mr. Barnes claims that

the fact that such a person has a

right of immediate access to a

lawyer countervails these pres-

sures. This right is indeed an

i mp o r t a nt

one

( t hough

t he

Government does not regard it as

being so important as to undertake

to pay solicitors under the Legal Aid

System for attendances at Garda

stations) but the solicitor is not as

yet entitled to remain w i th the

suspect during questioning.

Erosion of right to silence

My main criticism of Mr. Barnes'

speech is that he neglects to

mention that to a large extent the

right to silence has already been

drastically interfered with. There is

a legal obligation on persons

arrested under Section 30 of the

Offences Against the State Act,

1939 to a c c o u nt for

t he ir

movements and if they fail to

comply w i th such a requisition

under Section 52 of the Act they

are liable to be charged and

sentenced to six months imprison-

men t. Secondly, the Criminal

Justice Act, 1984 criminalised a

failure to give information in re-

lation to fire-arms and ammunition

(S15) and stolen property (S16).

Furthermore an arrested person is

now obliged in certain circum-

stances to account for various

objects, substances or marks or

objects found near him and if he

fails to do so a judge or jury may

draw whatever inferences they

wish adverse to the accused (S.18).

Similar inferences may be drawn if

an accused person fails to comply

w i th a request to account for his

presence at a perticular place (s.19).

Desp i te t he huge c amp a i gn

launched by prosecution auth-

orities and Gardai seeking from the

Legislature such powers as those

contained in Sections 15, 16, 18

and 19 of the Criminal Justice Act,

1984 these Sections are rarely, if

ever, used. I have only once

encountered the use of Section 16

and have never come across the

use of Sections 15, 18 and 19.

Similarly, it is only recently that

persons have been charged for

failing to account for their move-

ments pursuant to a requisition

under Section 52. If the prosecu-

tion authorities really feel that the

right to silence is such an obstacle

t hey wo u ld do be t t er in my

submission to utilise the powers

they already have rather t han

seeking a further dilution of the

right to silence.

Coherent reform of

criminal law

There is no doubt that there are

deficiencies in both our substantive

criminal law and in our criminal

procedures. There is a need as Mr.

Barnes says for "reforming statutes

based on c ohe r ent

general

principles". Defence lawyers would

we l c ome reforms and indeed

members of the Criminal Law

Committee of the Incorporated Law

Society of Ireland are contributing

to different discussion papers of

the Law Reform Commission.

Mr. Barnes refers to the "B ig Lie"

underpinning the right to silence. I

would suggest that his judgment

has been clouded by a different

"B ig Lie" - that is that all of the

d i f f i c u l t i es

en c oun t e r ed

by

prosecution authorities emanate

from this dreaded right. I believe

t h a t r e f o rm of t he law and

procedures in other respects as

suggested by him together w i th

a change in the manner in which

crime is investigated with a greater

emphasis on forensic, detective

and intelligence work might be

the real answer to his problems.

Michael

Staines,

Solicitor

U.S. Opportunity

for Young Solicitor

Sixteen young business people

from all over Ireland will be given an

opportunity to work in the United

States for six months under a

scheme announced recently by the

International Fund for Ireland (the

sponsors) and Hay MSL Ireland

Management Consultants. There is

an opening in the programme for a

young solicitor to spend six months

in a firm of lawyers in New Jersey.

Any firm which would like to

sponsor one of its younger soli-

citors on this programme, or obtain

further details should contact

Damien Hand,

Hay Management

Consultants, New Mount House,

22 - 24 Lower Mount Street, Dublin

2. Telephone: 765994.

Denis C. Guerin

New York Attorney at Law

Native Killarney, County Kerry.

Legal Advice and Assistance on

Wills, Inheritances, Family

Searches, throughout the U.S.A.

Specialising in Immigration,

Personal Injury,

Property Transactions, Divorces,

Wills, etc.

25 West 39th Street

New York NY 10018

Telephone:

Days: 212-398-9238

Evenings: 212 - 796 - 0970

Fax: 212-391-6917

PCS

PETROCARGO MARINE SURVEYORS LTD.

Capt. Thomas C. Nash

M. INST. PET.

Marine Consultancy;

Independent Marine Surveyors;

Marine Expert Witness;

Ship to Ship Transfer;

Vessel & Terminal Safety Inspection;

Recruitment; Procedures Manuals.

Cooleen House, Rushbrooke,

Cobh, Co. Cork.

Tel: 021-811677 Fax: 021-813009

15