Previous Page  53 / 462 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 53 / 462 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1992

News from the Law School

Repeat examination/

attendance fees

The attention of all apprentices -

and of their offices - is drawn to

a repeat examination fee and a

repeat attendance fee which will -

w i th effect from 3rd February,

1992 - respectively, apply to all

examinations repeated on either

the Professional Course or the

Advanced Course and to all repeat

days which have to be attended on

the Professional Course.

The repeat fees are:

Each paper in the Final Examination

- Second Part

£25 . 00

Each paper in the Final Examination

- Third Part

£25 . 00

Each day or part of a day on the

Professional Course . . . £25 . 00

A repeat day on the Professional

Course includes any day wh i ch an

apprentice has not attended on his

or her actual Professional Course

and is obliged to attend on a later

one.

Final E x am i n a t i on - First Part

No e x emp t i on a f t er f i ve years

The attention of practitioners and of

students is directed to Regulation

16 of the Solicitors Acts, 1954 and

1960

( App r en t i c e s h ip

and

Education) Regulations, 1991.

Regulation 16 (a) provides that a

law degree has a limited life for the

purpose of exemption from the

Society's Final Examination - First

Part. The holder of such a degree is

no longer entitled to an exemption

from the Final Examination - First

Part if more than five years have

elapsed from the 1st October in the

year in which that person obtained

the law degree.

Regulation 16 (b) reads as follows:

" I f a person who has been de-

clared by the Education Com-

mittee to have passed the Final

Examination - First Part does

not commence the Professional

Course within a period of five

years from the date of such

declaration, such person shall

cease, upon the expiration of

that period of five years, to be

e n t i t l ed t o c omme n ce t he

Professional Course unless he

shall first again sit and be

declared by the Committee to

have passed all the subjects

comprising the Final Examina-

tion - First Part."

Regulation 16 goes on to provide in

Clause (d) that a person who has

an exempting law degree and lacks

one or t w o s u b j e c ts in t he

Society's Final Examination - First

Part must pass the outstanding

subject or t wo subjects wi t h in a

period of five years from the 1st

October in the year in wh i ch that

person obtained his or her law

degree.

These provisions came into effect

on 1 January, 1992.

Optical Imaging

Technology

(Continued from page 31)

Optical disk technology is very ex-

citing. Dangers may lie in its allure.

Legal practitioners must question

their basic requirements for such a

system if they are to make the right

decision.

For further reading see:

Issues in Implementing Image

Management System in Law Firms:

Rosemary Gray, The Law Librarian,

Vol. 22, No. 2, August 1991.

A new Image for Law Firms: John

Matthews, Computers and Law,

Vol. 2 No. 4, September 1991.

Document Image Processing: Who

Needs It? Neville Ash, Accountancy

(August) 1991.

This column is contributed by mem-

bers of the Technology

Advisory

Group, an informal grouping of soli-

citors who, with the approval of the

Technology Committee of the Law

Society, seek to promote awareness

and use of technology within the

profession. Further details from the

Honorary Secretary, John Furlong,

c/o William Fry, Solicitors,

Fitzwilton

House, Wilton Place, Dublin 2.

Stamp Duty - No Amnesty on Interest

(Continued from page 32)

r e t r o s p e c t i on but a l l ows for

t he c h a n ge

in t he

i n t e r e st

regime.

The Revenue Comm i s s i o n e rs

appreciated that the changes to the

administration of stamp duty were

substantial and would take some

time to be fully disseminated to

practitioners. By deferring imple-

mentation for five months and

issuing a detailed statement of

practice we had hoped to bring the

changes to the attention of as

wide a public as possible. We are

a l wa ys p r epa r ed howe v er to

consider any problems that may

arise now that the provisions have

been brought into practice and to

d i s cuss t h em w i t h i nd i v i dual

solicitors or w i th the Law Society.

Yours sincerely,

Don

Thornhill,

Assistant

Secretary,

VAT & Capital Taxes.

34