Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  24 / 40 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 24 / 40 Next Page
Page Background

Chemical Technology • July 2015

22

Organic compounds

in produced waters

from shale

gas wells

T

he fastest growing trend for US domestic energy

generation is overwhelmingly un-conventional natu-

ral gas [1] and the environmental benefits of energy

generation from gas compared to coal is obvious [2,3]. The

vast amount of hydrocarbons potentially available in the

continental United States is in the form of onshore shale

gas as seen from the developments currently under way,

including: the Marcellus, Haynesville, Fayetteville, Barnett,

Eagle Ford, Bakken, Antrim, Utica, Niobara, New Albany,

Woodford, and Bossier plays. Unconventional natural gas

production has increased tenfold between 2001 and 2011,

[4,5] and shale gas is projected to increase from 23 %

of US natural gas production in 2009 to 47 % by 2035,

offsetting declining production from conventional sources.

The ability to extract shale gas in an economic and timely

manner has been achieved by the development and use

of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling techniques.

The fracturing fluid chemistry is tailored on a case-by-case

basis for each geographical area and sometimes even on

a well-by-well basis.

Although typical fracturing fluid contains predominantly

water (ca. 90 %) as well as sand or a ceramic proppant

(8–9 %), the fluid also contains all or some of the follow-

ing classes of chemicals: salts, friction reducers, scale

inhibitors, biocides, gelling agents, gel breakers, and organic

and inorganic acids [6,7]. There have been wide-spread

concerns over the use of these additives; however, the

large volumes of water used during hydraulic fracturing is

also a concern.

After the hydraulic fracture the pressure is released and

the frac fluid is allowed to return to the surface. The chemi-

cally engineered water that returns to the surface is called

‘flowback water’, and is mixed with water that is already in

the source rock, ‘connate fluids’. Generally the flow rate of

the returning water is very high with very little hydrocarbon.

The amount of load water (the amount actually injected

during the frac) recovered after a fracture ranges from

5–15 % in the Eagle Ford and Haynesville, to 50–60 % in

the Barnett and some parts of the Marcellus.

Once this water has returned to the surface, however,

The quality of shale gas produced

waters, as well as frac flowback waters,

is a current environmental concern and

disposal problem for producers. Re-use of

produced water for hydraulic fracturing is

being encouraged; however, knowledge

of the organic impurities is important in

determining the method of treatment.

by Samuel J Maguire-Boyle, Department of Chemistry, Rice University, Houston, Texas

and Andrew R Barron, Department of Chemistry, Department of Materials Science and

Nanoengineering, Rice University, Houston and Energy Safety Research Institute, College

of Engineering, Swansea University, Wales, UK