Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  26 / 40 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 26 / 40 Next Page
Page Background

Chemical Technology • July 2015

24

of shale reservoirs.

As part of our studies into the treatment of oil–water

mixtures [16] and understanding the challenges in treating

frac and produced water to make it ideal for re-use, we are

interested in the composition and compositional variation

between various produced waters. Such information will

assist in understanding of whether a particular treatment

process can be used generally or which treatment processes

should be applied to different produced waters. Our study

is presented herein along with suggestions for future treat-

ment protocols based upon the results.

Experimental

Please contact the editor for this section or go to

www.dx.doi.org/10.1039/C4EM00376D

to read the original

full paper online.

Results and discussion

Conductivity, pH and salt content

Before considering the organic content, we wanted to deter-

mine the inorganic content of the produced waters under

study. Other studies have shown the conductivity and pH

of the as-collected water. There is no direct relationship

between the conductivity and pH for the samples indicating

that the conductivity is a function of salt content and identity

rather than acidity (see below).

The chemistry of a shale reservoir is unlike that of a con-

ventional oil or gas reservoir that is flushed with hundreds of

pore volumes of transient water resulting in leaching of the

rock and other components to an equilibrium level. Shale

has a very low permeability (concrete is 10² to 10

4

more per-

meable) and there has been little or no movement of fresh

water (or waters of a different mineral content) since the

rock was formed. Furthermore, shales are under-saturated

to water and the levels of salt in the connate waters within

the shales are often at salinity equal to the seawater the

shale was deposited from. In other words, shale is a reac-

tor waiting for an influx of fresh ingredients, and thus when

under-saturated fresh water or evenmoderate salinity water,

is introduced during a frac, salts, some organics, and other

minerals that were in equilibrium with the connate waters

are solubilized.

The ion content for each of the produced water samples

was determined by ICP-OES. The results are summarized

in Table 1. High alkali metal levels are not an issue with

regard to the re-use of the produced water in subsequent

hydraulic fracturing. In contrast to the alkali metals, alkaline

earth (Group 2) metals are associated with scale formation

[19, 20]. In particular, when calcium and barium levels are

above ca. 20 000 mg L

-1

scale inhibitors must be employed

and or the salt content lowered before the water can be

re-used down hole [4].

Carbon content

The total carbon (TC), non-purgeable organic carbon (NPOC),

also known as total organic content (TOC), and total inor-

ganic carbon (TIC) for each produced water sample was

measured (Table 2) and the results are shown in Figure 3.

For all of the produced water samples the NPOC is signifi-

cantly higher than the TIC.

Identification of organic compounds

Figure 1 shows a representative GC for Marcellus produced

water. The peak assignment is provided based upon the fit-

ting of the integrated mass spectrum for each peak. While

all the peaks could be assigned a suitable compound, there

is a quality parameter (Q) that provides a goodness of fit of

the data, ie, a confidence level in the assignment. Figure 2

shows the percentage of peaks in the GC of the produced

waters within a particular quality range of the assignment

by mass spectrometry.

We note that in the work of Orem

et al

less than 20 % of

potential organic compounds were actually identified [15].

For simplicity in giving a representative example of the

types of organic compound found in each water sample, we

have limited the contents of our Tables to those compounds

that are assigned with confidence in more than one well

sample. Aromatics are defined as molecules containing one

or more aromatic rings, and are slightly more polarisable.

Resins and asphaltenes have polar (heteroatom) substitu-

ents. The distinction between the two is that asphaltenes

are insoluble in heptane whereas resins are miscible with

heptane. As such the resins should be observed by as-

Unlike coalbed

methane pro-

duced water,

shale oil/

gas produced

water appears

not to contain

significant

quantities of

polyaromatic

hydrocarbons,

reducing the

potential

health hazard.

Table 2 Chemical analysis (mg L1) of the produced water samplesa

Element

Marcellus (PA)

Eagle Ford (TX)

Barnett (NM)

Na

523.6

45.9

5548.9

K

2605.8

17043.3

4566.5

Li

0.0

1200.6

84407.4

Rb

47.0

0.0

0.0

Mg

289.7

28.2

5747.2

Ca

1387.5

111.2

33971.8

Sr

92.9

34.5

2461.8

Ba

0.0

4.7

17.2

Ti

0.0

16.2

15.1

V

4.2

16.2

14.6

Cr

11.0

13.6

11.5

Mn

0.0

11.5

9.4

Fe

8.4

1246.5

75.7

Ni

0.0

36.5

12.0

Cu

2.6

0.0

0.0

Zn

65.8

0.0

684.9

Hg

14.6

0.0

0.0

B

0.0

40.2

70.5

Si

727.1

4416.6

0.0

Sn

206.2

3.1

124.2

P

0.0

29.2

1177.1

As

26.1

0.0

2.1

Sb

0.5

2.1

9.9

Bi

36.5

50.1

161.3

S

189.0

413.9

290.8

Table 1 Conductivity and pH of as collected produced water samples

Water

Conductivity (mS)

pH

Marcellus (PA)

28.5

6.85

Eagle Ford (TX)

31.1

5.95

Barnett (NM)

52.8

7.43