941 / 1498
Role of Peri-transplant RT
Patient No:
Total (RT)
Important findings
Poen 1996
100 (24)
92% LC
RFS & OS better (SS) in
RT naive
Mundt 1997 53
•
2/3 of relapse in
old sites
•
RT improves LC in: all sites, persistent
>induction, persistent >ASCT
Rappaport
1997
136 (51)
RT ↑ RFS if
>2cm residual
at time of
transplant
Vose 2001
184
1ry
refractory
Registry data
No RT was an adverse
prognostic factor
on
MVA
Biswas 2010 164 (79)
10% better
LC
•
Survival
benefit for RT
•
Benefit in RCHOP > CHOP