Previous Page  152 / 216 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 152 / 216 Next Page
Page Background

30

The Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society ot Ireland.

[DECEMBER, 1923

The President of our Free State went

this year on a double mission of Peace ;

one that the Free State might be enrolled

in the League of Nations, and the other to

pay tribute to

the shrine of that great

Irishman Columbanus, the first great mission

ary who left our shores to preach Christian

peace and true freedom.

In his farewell

letter to his brethren in the North of Europe

Columbanus uses the phrase : " Si tollis liber-

tatem tollis dignitatem," words signifying

that worthiness of life must be the companion

of true freedom, that freedom cannot exist

save when accompanied by all that seemliness

and civic virtue which is expressed by the

Latin word "dignitas" and which has been so

lacking in our country during recent years.

However, to-day we are justified in hoping

that that wretched period of hate, and shame

of crime and destruction has ended, and for

ever.

The country has recognised too that

inaptitude for honest work does not consti

tute the hero or the patriot, and we have

an indication of returning confidence and

enterprise in the extensive application which

already has been made to share in the

National Loan.

I beg to move the adoption

of the report of the Council.

MR. STIRLING, Vice-President, seconded

the adoption of the report.

MR. JAMES BRADY said he was sorry

to see by the report that amongst the other

evils arising from Partition that the member

ship of the Society had been considerably

reduced.

As to the Courts of Justice Bill,

ho personally regretted that no attempt was

made to amalgamate both branches of the

legal profession in a country which consisted

only of about

four million

inhabitants,

and that as well as having two branches of

the profession they had also the expensive

luxury of two sets of judiciaries. He further

regretted to observe from the report that

but small attention appeared to be given by

the Government to the suggested arnend-

ments to the Bill as proposed by the Council.

SIR GEORGE

ROCHE said that the

{ailing off in membership was due to the

ack of accommodation and the loss of their

library. They ought to press forward their

claim for compensation on the Government

and to get suitable premises. He also drew

attention

to

the difficulty

in obtaining

Accountant-General's accounts of funds in

Court.

MR. T. H. R. CRAIG said that it was

stated that there was a demand for the

Courts of Justice Bill, and that the English

laws were not suitable for this country.

In

or about the year 1756 the Irish Parliament

established civil bill procedure and county

courts.

It was they who were first with

their procedure—and they had procedure

in this country as distinct from a Crown

bill that was set up by a Grand Jury—and

a great many of the sections were taken out

of their bill and embodied in 14 and 15

Victoria, which was their first county court

in

this country.

This bill, he believed, instead of making

law cheaper, would make it cost double. All

this could have been avoided if the Govern

ment had gone around to the profession and

explained what

they wanted. The bill

would double the expense, would not work,

and would muddle the whole thing. The

bill would not hurt the solicitors' profession,

but would hurt the public.

MR. PATRICK J. BRADY said that,

rightly or wrongly, some people thought

that the old laws were not adapted to the

needs of this country, and that they ought

to be altered and improved.

It was obliga

tory on the Government, under the terms of

the Constitution, that this reorganisation

of the judicial system should be under

taken.

He believed that, if the bill was

given a chance it would work in the interests

of the profession as well as in the interests

of the public.

DR. T. J. QUIRKE said that he did not

agree with the views of Mr. P. J. Brady.

The bill would damage credit. One gentle

man in the Dail said that it was no business

of theirs to enable a Manchester man to

recover his debts here. Was ever such a

doctrine put forward ?

He thought that it was the business of the

law to make it easy fora man to recover what