Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  56 / 56
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 56 / 56
Page Background

EXPERT REVIEW PANEL (ERP) SOLIDS IN SYRUPS

**. V1

Page 3 of 3

RECOMMENDATION OF PROPOSED MODIFICATION

1)

Yes - I agree that the proposed changes can be implemented

2)

Yes - I agree that the proposed changes can be implemented

3)

Yes - I agree that the proposed changes can be implemented for OMA 932.14.

4)

Yes - I agree that the proposed changes can be implemented for OMA 932.14.

5)

Yes – I agree that the proposed changes can be implemented for OMA 932.14 with the following

revisions

6)

Yes – I agree that the proposed changes can be implemented for OMA 932.14 with the following

revisions

Please explain and delineate for scientific reasons

Please explain the additional revisions:

1)

No additional revision is required

2)

see suggestions above. While this is definitely a change in technology and thus is technically a major

change, I feel that the study conducted provides adequate information on the performance of the digital

density meter and it would also be appropriate to make to an alternative technique within Method

932.14, assuming that the application statement includes only those matrices represented in the side-by-

side study.

3)

Include under method name: " specific gravity method of solutions containing sucrose, liquid sugar

products, and other nonsucrose solids"

a) direct - add "solutions containing sucrose"

e) determination- remove "carbonated beverage reference" - redundant

RECOMMENDATION OF PROPOSED MODIFICATION LEVEL

1)

Editorial Change

2)

Minor Modification

3)

Major Modification

4)

Minor Modification

5)

Minor Modification

6)

Minor Modification

REVIEWERS

1)

George Joseph

2)

Mohamed Hamad

3)

Dana Krueger

4)

SNEH BHANDARI

5)

Jo Marie Cook

6)

Prem Virmani