Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  41 / 66 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 41 / 66 Next Page
Page Background

Working wi th Google

39

YouTube’s cofounders did not need to worry about the business aspects

of developing YouTube anymore. They could concentrate on being cre-

ative instead.

Google, on the other hand, had a lot of legal problems to worry

about. In March of 2007, just a few months after Google took over,

Viacom International, Inc., sued the company for $1 billion in damages.

Viacom International claimed that YouTube, and Google by extension,

had broken copyright laws by allowing users to easily upload videos that

were already copyrighted by Viacom. The lawsuit lasted many years,

but was finally dismissed in 2010. YouTube had proved that it was doing

everything it could to abide by copyright laws and was not intentionally

allowing users to break those laws. Viacom has tried to appeal this rul-

ing, but has been unsuccessful.

Viacom versus Google was a very important case because it set the

standard for what media is allowed on the Internet in the future. The

Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998 protected Google because it

stated that websites could not be sued for copyright infringement as long

as they removed copyrighted content when notified of the violation. You-

Tube has always done its best to abide by the law, both before and after

Google bought it.

PARTNER PROGRAM

In May of 2007, YouTube introduced a way for users to make money

alongside YouTube. Popular videos were given the option of hosting ad-

vertisements that would be displayed before the user video began. For

every person who watched these advertisements, the user who uploaded

the video would receive a cut of the money YouTube received.

About 45 percent of the money made through advertising goes di-

rectly to YouTube, with the other 55 percent going to the person who

uploaded the video. In 2013, the average partner earned about $2 per