Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  767 / 1145 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 767 / 1145 Next Page
Page Background

The Importance of Functional Safety Assessment and its Application

Page

5

of

12

4. Stages when FSAs are performed

The IEC Functional Safety Standards provide more guidance on the stages when an FSA shall be

undertaken. The IEC 61508 standard requires that FSAs apply to all phases of the safety lifecycle.

For the Process Industries, IEC 61511 provides a staged approach to the Functional Safety

Assessments as shown in

Figure: 2

below:

Figure: 2 – SIS safety life-cycle phases and FSA stages

There are five FSA stages defined by the standard indicated from S1 to S5 in the figure above.

At the start of the safety lifecycle and for when process hazard(s) are identified, the associated

operating risks are analysed and the necessary risk reduction is identified for the respective hazard.

Based on this identification, the safety functions are allocated. Typically, each hazard and risk

analysis inclues the description of the assumptions made during the analysis and any human factor

impact associated with specific operational constraints. The safety requirements specification

identifies the necessary requirements for the allocation for a SIS based on these factors. Appropriate

techniques and measures for implementing the above activities are therefore subject to a formal

Functional Safety Assessment as this impacts the subsequent stages of the lifecycle.

As explained in section

2

of this paper, one of the major contributors for a potential malfunction of a

SIS is associated with the lack of depth regarding the contents of an appropriate safety requirements

specification. The FSA process if properly applied, should ensure for the development of a robust

SRS prior to design approval. This is identified by the stage S1 in

Figure: 2.

Failure to undertake an

FSA at this stage is likely to have greater impact upon the rest of the lifecycle and may even have the

potential to seed errors into the project which may lead to an omisssion or incident at later lifecycle

phases and in doing so, cost the project heavily if not addressed at this earlier opportunity.