Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  772 / 1145 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 772 / 1145 Next Page
Page Background

The Importance of Functional Safety Assessment and its Application

Page

10

of

12

8.2 Perform

FSAs are subject to the ‘judgement’ made by the assessor during the time of the assessment. This

judgement is typically arrived at based on the evidence provided by the project team. The project

team is requested to provide the necessary evidence for every activity that has been followed to

deliver the lifecycle phase outcome.

This typically includes review of the functional safety management system utilised for execution of the

respective activities such as the assessments, processes, design, engineering, verification and

validation applied and the eventual requirements for operation and maintenance of the respective

phase deliverables.

An FSA will focus on the work done since the previous functional safety assessment and the extent of

remediation to date. This is required to ensure implementation of any corrective actions identified as

part of the earlier assessments performed and the commitment of the team in establishing functional

safety.

The assessment will need to review the activities & associated assumptions identified during the

specific lifecycle phase(s), its implementation and the outputs obtained during each phase of the

safety lifecycle.

Assessments shall also be made on all the relevant claims of compliance as made by the suppliers

and other parties responsible for achieving functional safety. This may also cover the review of the

assessment records made by the supplier organisations for their deliverables. This is to ensure

functional safety is not compromised by the supporting supply chain.

Assessment shall be made for personnel competency, who are involved in each phase of the

lifecycle. Evidence of competency assessment, its process, the implementation of how competencies

are assessed, basis of competency assessment and the relevant actions from any competency gap

closures will need to be reviewed for all parties involved in any safety lifecycle phase.

Review of evidence of the document control, management of change, configuration management,

design & engineering, verification & validation processes applied shall be part of the FS assessment

process.

Where design, development and production tools are used, its output and their impact on functional

safety shall be subject to FS assessment. The assessment review will need to identify if there is no

compromise on functional safety while utilising such tools for design, development and testing of the

SIS.

All modifications are subject to FSAs. The standard mandates that assessment shall review the

impact of the proposed modification(s), without which, the modifications shall not be implemented.

FSAs shall include review of the functional safety audit report(s) and the evidence of the respective

corrective action reports raised by the audit.

Periodic FSAs during the Operation and Maintenance phase of the lifecycle, shall review whether the

O&M activities are performed against the designed requirements and assumptions. When

decommissioning of the SIS occurs either in part or full, the FSAs shall review for any impact on

functional safety performance demanded on the remainder of the operating plant SIS or other

dependent SIS.

Documented evidence for all the activities under review shall be identified and recorded when

performing an FSA.