![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0007.jpg)
GAZETTE
JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1979
refuse an application if, for example, he considers that the
mark is immoral, illegal, improper, scandalous or
misleading.
An appeal lies to the court against any objection raised
by the Controller in respect of a registration.
27
One
instructive case concerned an appeal against an appeal
against a refusal by the Controller to register the mark
"Durex" in respect of surgical gloves. Hamilton J. upheld
the appeal. He found that the word "Durex", although
associated in public mind with a particular brand of
contraceptives, was not associated with contraceptive
generally to such an extent as to be synonymous
therewith, or to such an extent as to be likely to deceive or
cause confusion if registered in respect of surgical
gloves.
28
Opposition
An application for registration, after it has been
accepted, is advertised by the Controller. Any person
may, within one month from the date of the advertisement
of an application, give notice to the Controller of
opposition to the registration.
29
Opposition may be based on any ground that would
preclude or invalidate registration — the most common
ground of opposition is that the mark concerned is too
similar to an existing mark. An appeal lies to the court
from the decision of the Controller as to whether an
opposed mark should be registered.
When an application for registration has been accepted
and the time for opposition has expired, or where the
application has been opposed but not successfully, the
trade mark is registered as of the date of application.
30
Certificate , Duration and Renewal
A certificate is issued under the Controller's seal on the
registration of a trade mark.
31
The duration of the initial
registration is seven years. Registration may be renewed
indefinitely thereafter for fourteen-year periods.
32
Disclaimer
If a trade mark contains any part not separately
registered by the proprietor as a trade mark, or matter
common to the trade or otherwise of a non-distinctive
character, the Controller or the court, in deciding whether
the trade mark should be entered or remain on the
register, may require a disclaimer by thq proprietor. As a
condition to the trade mark being on the register, the
proprietor may be required, for example, to disclaim any
right to the exclusive use of any part of the trade mark.
33
The recent case of
Western Brands Inc. v. The
Controller
provides an illustration.
34
It concerned an
application for Part B registration of the name "Silva-
Thins", in respect of cigarettes. On appeal from the
Controller's refusal to register the name, it was held that
"Silva-Thins", with a hyphen between the two words, was
capable of distinguishing within the meaning of section
18. The presiding judge set out however, as a pre-
condition to registration, that the applicant disclaim any
right to the exclusive use of either the word "Silva" or the
word "Thins".
It is clear that a disclaimer under the Act does not
affect any rights which the proprietor may have in respect
of the mark at common law.
EFFECT ON REGISTRATION
The effect of registration depends on whether the mark
is registered in Part A or Part B. A person entitled to a
trade mark registered in Part A has the exclusive right
to the use of the mark in relation to those goods for which
it is registered.
35
A person entitled to a mark registered in Part B is also
entitled to exclusive user.
36
The degree of protection
afforded this right is, however, lower than that given in
respect of Part A marks. If another manufacturer or
trader uses a similar or even identical mark, the person
entitled to a Part B mark will fail in an infringement
action if the defendant proves two points: first, that the use
complained of is not likely to deceive or cause confusion;
and, secondly, that the use complained of is not likely to be
taken as indicating a connection in the course of trade
between the goods and the person entitled to the registered
trade mark.
DEALINGS ON THE REGISTER
Trade marks may be assigned, transmitted or licensed.
The register, moreover, may be rectified in certain
instances.
Assignment and Transmission
37
Registered trade marks are, subject to certain
conditions, assignable and transmissable, either in
connection with the goodwill of the business or not.
38
An
assignment may be in respect of all or only some of the
goods in respect of which a trade mark is registered.
Unregistered trade marks are assignable and trans-
missable under the Act, but only in conjunction with
registered trade marks.
Assignment of a trade mark without the goodwill of a
business has no effect unless and until, upon application
by the assignee, notice of the assignment is published by
the Controller in the Official Journal of Industrial and
Commercial Property.
39
Associated trade marks are assignable and trans-
missible as a whole, and not separately.
40
A registered user has no assignable or transmissible
right in the mark.
41
Licences: Registered Users
The Act contains a number of closely circumscribed
provisions for the licensing of trade marks.
42
The
prospective licensee of a mark must, together with the
proprietor of the mark, apply in writing to the Controller
for registration of the user required. The Controller has a
discretion in deciding whether or not to grant the licence;
he is obliged, in particular, to have regard to the public
interest.
Rectification
The register may be rectified either by the Conroller or
by the court at the request of the proprietor of a trade
mark, or on the application of a "person agrieved".
43
The
possible grounds for rectification are numerous. For
example, a registration obtained by fraud, or an entry
made in the register without sufficient cause, may be
rectified. In
Re Carl Zeiss Stiftuna,
44
a German company
applied for the removal of the trade mark "Punktal" from
the register. The mark had previously been registered by
an Irish company in respect of "lenses of all kinds". The
application for rectification was granted, on the ground
(among others) that the Irish company had not been the
proprietor of the trade mark at the time of its registration.
7