GAZETTE
JULY-AUGUST
1979
policies of the Member States have in fact diverged much
more profoundly than at any other time since the
immediate Post-War period. Some Countries have
weathered the storm better than others and have been
able to control inflation fairly well but others have not
found it so easy. These different outcomes of what is
certainly a common wish to control inflation derive from
a number of basic differences between Member States
which have proved more important than had perhaps
been envisaged in earlier years. These include differences
in the stages of economic development of Member States
which as a result requires the application of different
economic policies, differences in the degree to which
Member States are dependant on export trade, differences
in the institutional structures of Member States — a
particular sector being that of Trade Unions and their role
in Industry. How a country is placed in relation to such
factors will depend on what rate of inflation will
affect such a country. With divergences in inflation
rates there follows a decisive impact on the stability of
exchange rates and this has a detrimental effect on
policies — an obvious one being the Common
Agricultural Policy. As a result the emergence of a
Common Community Economic Policy is faced with
many difficulties and is unlikely to emerge unless a
number of pre-conditions are met. These pre-conditions
would basically include mutual assistance on an extensive
scale. But that is not the complete answer - Member
States must create for themselves a climate to take
advantage of this assistance — otherwise these loans or
grants will be worthless because Countries will not have
the basic elements for stability. The recent agreement to
introduce a European Monetary System is a combined
effort on behalf of the Member States to stabilise
exchange rates. With its introduction there will be
restrictions and thereby limits to the extent by which any
currency may be allowed to deviate from the system. This
will inevitably involve discipline and possibly restraint but
the acceptance by Member States of such discipline could
provide the basis for sound economic and indeed social
progress. The problems in this area remain immense but
their solution is a pre-condition for the ultimate achieve-
ment of political and economic unity.
Some of the problems arise because the Member States
are deeply involved in the world economy and the
experience of the 1970s has shown how damaging the
turbulence of the international economy can be. The
rampant inflation, the many unemployed, the near
destruction of major industries have largely been induced
from outside. The Community cannot turn its back on the
world economy but it must have some form of protection.
A general tariff is a blunt instrument of protection and
maybe the Community does not need it. But the
Community has not replaced the declining tariff by other
means of defence against the turbulence of the inter-
national economy nor has it done much to bring the
instability under control by commmon actions with its
economic partners. Tariff-cutting can be one element in a
constructive policy but it must be supplemented by other
measures in order to give stability to the Community in
this turbulent world.
The Community is seeking positive solutions to these
problems through the collective and co-ordinated action
of its Member States aimed at benefiting all rather than
through unilateral and perhaps contradictory measures
which although possibly of benefit to some might by the
same token prove injurious to others. This co-ordinated
approach is the essential characteristic of the Community
and while it may sometimes appear slow to those
demanding immediate action it represents a fundamental
application of the democratic method and ensures that
before decisions are taken the long-term interests of all the
Member States are duly taken into account. It is this basic
principle which has guided Community policies and
which will continue to govern its approach in the future.
Unfortunately the future well-being of the Community is
far from certain. There are many problems to be solved
and if we fail to meet this challenge we shall certainly be
worse off in all respects and Western Europe would enter
a time of troubles such as we have not known since the
War. Public opinion must also regain confidence in the
potential of the Community to serve the interests of the
peoples of Europe. Ireland has benefited from Member-
ship of the Community. The market opportunities have
provided the means for Economic expansion on which
Social and even Political progress will be possible. The
future of this country is closely linked with future develop-
ments in the Community. However, we have problems of
our own making and these we will have to solve if we are
to benefit from Community Membership. This will not be
easy but we must face that reality. And eventually this
economic progress could contribute to the political
progress of the whole of Ireland. This is surely an ideal
worth striving to achieve. Ladies and gentlemen, the
Community is at the crossroads but we cannot stand still
- We must go forward together. I will leave you with the
words of Robert Schuman, the French Foreign Minister
who said in 1950:
''Europe will not be built in a day; nor as part of some
overall design. It will be built through practical achieve-
ments that first create a sense of common purpose."
The Guest Speakers at the Meeting were Mr. Richard
Burke, member of the E.E.C. Commission, the Hon. Mr.
Justice Liam Hamilton, Judge of the High Court, and Mr.
Michael O'Leary, T.D., Deputy leader of the Labour
Party.
Law Society
Vacancy for Examiner and
Lecturer
Applications are invited not later than Friday, 17th
August, 1979 for the post of:
EXAMI NER
AND
LECTURER
IN
COMPANY LAW
Particulars may be obtained from:-
Professor Richard Woulfe,
Director of Education,
Incorporated Law Society of Ireland,
Blackball Place.
Dublin 7.
101