Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1447 / 1708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1447 / 1708 Next Page
Page Background

696

http://oncology.thelancet.com

Vol 8 August 2007

Articles

Primary postoperative chemotherapy without radiotherapy

for intracranial ependymoma in children: the UKCCSG/SIOP

prospective study

Richard G Grundy, Sophie AWilne, Claire LWeston, Kath Robinson, Linda S Lashford, James Ironside, Tim Cox, W Kling Chong,

Richard H A Campbell, Cliff C Bailey, Rao Gattamaneni, Sue Picton, Nicky Thorpe, Conor Mallucci, MartinW English, Jonathan A G Punt,

David AWalker, DavidW Ellison, David Machin, for the Children’s Cancer and Leukaemia Group (formerly UKCCSG) Brain Tumour Committee

Summary

Background

Over half of childhood intracranial ependymomas occur in children younger than 5 years. As an adjuvant

treatment, radiotherapy can be effective, but has the potential to damage the child’s developing nervous system at a

crucial time—with a resultant reduction in IQ and cognitive impairment, endocrinopathy, and risk of second

malignancy. We aimed to assess the role of a primary chemotherapy strategy in avoiding or delaying radiotherapy in

children younger than 3 years with intracranial ependymoma.

Methods

BetweenDecember, 1992, and April, 2003, we enrolled 89 childrenwith ependymoma whowere aged 3 years or

younger at diagnosis, of whom nine had metastatic disease on pre-operative imaging. After maximal surgical

resection, children received alternating blocks of myelosuppressive and non-myelosuppressive chemotherapy every

14 days for an intended duration of 1 year. Radiotherapy was withheld unless local imaging (ie, from the child’s

treatment centre) showed progressive disease.

Findings

50 of the 80 patients with non-metastatic disease progressed, 34 of whom were irradiated for progression.

The 5-year cumulative incidence of freedom from radiotherapy for the 80 non-metastatic patients was 42% (95% CI

32–53). With a median follow-up of 6 years (range 1·5–11·3), overall survival for the non-metastatic patients at 3 years

was 79·3% (95% CI 68·5–86·8) and at 5 years 63·4% (51·2–73·4). The corresponding values for event-free survival

were 47·6% (36·2–58·1) and 41·8% (30·7–52·6). There was no significant difference in event-free or overall survival

between complete and incomplete surgical resection, nor did survival differ according to histological grade, age at

diagnosis, or site of disease. In 47 of 59 (80%) patients who progressed, relapse resulted from local control only. The

median time to progression for the 59 patients who progressed was 1·6 years (range 0·1–10·2 years). The median age

at irradiation of the whole group was 3·6 years (range 1·5–11·9). For the 80 non-metastatic patients, the 23 who

achieved the highest relative dose intensity of chemotherapy had the highest post-chemotherapy 5-year overall survival

of 76% (95% CI 46·6–91·2), compared with 52% (33·3–68·1) for the 32 patients who achieved the lowest relative dose

intensity of chemotherapy.

Interpretation

This protocol avoided or delayed radiotherapy in a substantial proportion of children younger than

3 years without compromising survival. These results suggest, therefore, that primary chemotherapy strategies have

an important role in the treatment of very young children with intracranial ependymoma.

Introduction

Over half of childhood intracranial ependymomas occur

in children under 5 years of age, and the effective

treatment of these patients remains one of the more

difficult tasks in paediatric oncology.

1

The success of any

treatment strategy in this age group has to be measured

not only in terms of event-free or overall survival, but

also in terms of the potential for serious or irreversible

damage to the developing brain.

Most childhood ependymomas arise in the posterior

fossa, are large, and are difficult to resect. There is

general acceptance that adjuvant therapy is required

even when complete resection is achieved.

2–7

Choices

over adjuvant therapy are difficult, and to an extent, have

depended on the underlying philosophies of national

groups and institutions. Radiotherapy is effective, but its

delivery is complicated by the vulnerability of an

immature CNS to radiation damage. Although the

degree of functional impairment depends on field size,

radiation dose, and age at treatment, most long-term

survivors have multiple problems including a global

reduction in IQ and more specific cognitive defects such

as short-term memory loss.

8–11

Preliminary studies

suggest that conformal radiotherapy to the posterior

fossa in children older than 12 months might not result

in severe neurocognitive damage, at least in the short

term.

4

However, there are other serious delayed effects

from radiotherapy, such as neuroendocrine sequelae and

second cancers which could adversely affect the child’s

quality of life.

12–14

The perception of unacceptable side-effects of cranial

radiotherapy in young children led a number of institutions

and national groups to adopt chemotherapy-based

strategies designed to avoid or delay irradiation.

2,3,5,6,15

Lancet Oncol

2007; 8: 696–705

Published

Online

July 20, 2007

DOI:10.1016/S1470-

2045(07)70208-5

See

Reflection and Reaction

page 665

Children’s BrainTumour

Research Centre, University of

Nottingham, Queen’s Medical

Centre, Nottingham, UK

(Prof R G Grundy MBChB,

S AWilne MBBS,

J A G Punt MBBS,

Prof D AWalker MBBS)

;

Children’s Cancer and

Leukaemia Group, Data Centre,

Leicester, UK

(C LWeston MSc,

K Robinson BA,

L S Lashford MBBS,

R H A Campbell MBChB,

Prof C C Bailey MBBS,

R Gattamaneni MBChB,

Prof D Machin PhD)

;Western

General Hospital NHSTrust,

Edinburgh, UK

(Prof J Ironside MBChB)

; Great

Ormond Street Hospital for

Children NHSTrust, London,

UK

(T Cox MBChB,

W K Chong MBChB)

; St James

Hospital NHSTrust, Leeds, UK

(S Picton MBChB)

; Alder Hey

Children’s Hospital, Liverpool,

UK

(NThorpe MBChB,

C Mallucci MBChB)

; Birmingham

Children’s Hospital,

Birmingham, UK

(MW English MBChB)

;

Newcastle General Infirmary

NHSTrust, Newcastle upon

Tyne, UK

(Prof DW Ellison MBChir)

;

National Cancer Centre,

Singapore

(D Machin)

Correspondence to:

Prof Richard Grundy, Children’s

BrainTumour Research Centre,

University of Nottingham,The

Medical School, Queen’s Medical

Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH,

UK

richard.grundy@nottingham.

ac.uk