Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1449 / 1708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1449 / 1708 Next Page
Page Background

Articles

698

http://oncology.thelancet.com

Vol 8 August 2007

Radiotherapy was withheld unless there was progressive

disease defined on local imaging—age did not determine

whether radiotherapy was given. For localised, non-

metastatic tumours, 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions of 2 Gy

per fraction, 5 days per week, was prescribed for the

radiologically defined macroscopic tumour plus a margin

of 2 cm. Whole neuroaxis radiotherapy was recommended

for metastatic disease: for children aged 3 years and older,

35 Gy in 21 daily fractions of 1·67 Gy per fraction was

prescribed to the whole neuroaxis. This was followed by a

boost to the primary tumour of 20 Gy in 12 daily fractions

of 1·67 Gy per fraction given to the initial tumour volume,

plus a margin of 2 cm. For infants younger than 3 years,

the whole neuroaxis dose was reduced to 25 Gy in 20 daily

fractions of 1·25 Gy per fraction. The boost dose to the

primary tumour was 20 Gy in 12 daily fractions of 1·67 Gy

per fraction (ie, as for the older children).

Assessment

Patients were staged by full neuraxis imaging,

postoperative scans (within 48 h) were recommended,

but for various reasons this was achieved in most but

not all cases. All patients underwent primary surgery

with the aim of achieving maximal surgical resection.

A complete resection was recorded when there was no

visible tumour documented by the surgeon at the end of

operation, a subtotal resection when visible tumour

remained, and a biopsy when only sufficient tumour for

diagnosis was removed. The operative notes and

postoperative scans were reviewed centrally (JAGP,

CM). Central radiological review of the extent of the

surgical resection on postoperative scans was done

according to SIOP criteria (CM, TC, WKC, RG).

17

Routine scans were requested at day 112, 224, and the

end of the chemotherapy schedule. 6-monthly post-

treatment scans were recommended. MRI scans of

children on long-term follow-up of more than 4 years

post-surgery were reviewed centrally for evidence of

leucoencephalopathy as determined by white matter

changes acting as a surrogate marker for methotrexate

neurotoxicity. Minimum criteria for this review included

T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI scans with

gadolinium enhancement. Cerebrospinal fluid samp-

ling before chemotherapy was recommended.

Histological slides from all patients were reviewed by

DE and JI. Tumours were classified as grade II or III

according to WHO criteria.

18

Ependymoblastomas, which

are now classified with other primitive neuroectodermal

tumours, were excluded.

18

Toxicity was assessed by the

treating physician and coded in the CCLG data centre.

The UKCCSG shortened listing of National Cancer

Institute common toxicity criteria version 2.0 were

used.

Statistical analysis

Standardised

received

dose

of

chemotherapy

(SRDChemo) was calculated for each patient as the

Children weighing up to

10 kg (dose by weight)

Children weighing more than

10 kg (dose by surface area)

Course 1 (day 0)

Vincristine (IV bolus)

0·05 mg/kg

1·5 mg/m²

Carboplatin (IV over 4 h)

20 mg/kg

550 mg/m²

Course 2 (day 14)

Vincristine (IV bolus)

0·05 mg/kg

1·5 mg/m²

Methotrexate

250 mg/kg

8000 mg/m²

Folinic acid

15 mg fixed dose

15 mg fixed dose

Course 3 (day 28)

Vincristine (IV bolus)

0·05 mg/kg

1·5 mg/m²

Cyclophosphamide

50 mg/kg

1500 mg/m²

Mesna

60 mg/kg

1800 mg/m²

Course 4 (day 42)

Cisplatin (continuous infusion for

48 h)

1·3 mg/kg×2 days

80 mg/m² in two divided doses

IV=intravenous.There were seven cycles in total, each cycle was delivered over 56 days.

Table 1

: Chemotherapy schedule

Metastases at diagnosis*

No

Yes

Study population

80

9

Male sex

54

4

Younger than <1 year at diagnosis

11

3

Median age (range) in years

1·93

(0·05–3·16)

1·36

(0·24–2·25)

Infratentorial ependymoma

69

7

Supratentorial ependymoma

11

2

Central review histology as classic (II) 54

5

WHO classified as anaplastic (III)

26

4

*Based on preoperative MRI.

Table 2

: Patient characteristics at diagnosis

Number of patients (n=89)

Haematological

Grade 3

6

Grade 4

83

Renal

Grade 3

3

Grade 4

0

Audiological

Grade 3

3

Grade 4

2

Gastrointestinal

Grade 3

23

Grade 4

3

Other

Grade 3

27

Grade 4

3

Table 3

: Cumulative toxicity