Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1537 / 1708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1537 / 1708 Next Page
Page Background

St Jude RT1 cohort received adjuvant postoperative radiation.

Strikingly, survival for STR EPN_PFA was not different between

those who received

fi

rst-line external-beam radiation and those

who did not in the CERN and Burdenko cohorts (Appendix

Fig A6

,

online only). In the GENE cohort, there was a statistically sig-

ni

fi

cant difference by a univariable analysis in patients who did not

receive radiation; however, survival remains poor even in patients

with subtotal resections who received external-beam irradiation.

These data suggest that the bene

fi

t of post-surgical

fi

rst-line

adjuvant external-beam irradiation for patients with EPN_PFA

is limited in the face of a subtotal resection and that these patients

should be prioritized for clinical trials of novel therapy.

Patients With GTR EPN_PFB Have an Excellent

Prognosis

As a result of limited patient numbers, we combined patients

with EPN_PFB from the GENE, St Jude RT1, and CERN cohorts

and demonstrated that STR results in a high risk of relapse (10-year

PFS for GTR, 0.740; 95% CI, 0.550 to 0.859; 10-year PFS for STR,

0.50; 95% CI, 0.271 to 0.692). These

fi

ndings were con

fi

rmed in

a cohort of patients with EPN_PFB treated at the Burdenko In-

stitute

( Fig 3 )

. As a result of the similar behavior of the two cohorts

and the relatively small number of patients with EPN_PFB in each

cohort, we combined all patients in our subsequent multivariable

analysis. In a multivariable analysis restricted to EPN_PFB, a similar

P

= .4

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time Since Diagnosis (years)

OS (probability)

No first-line XRT

First-line XRT

29 27 26 25 21 19 18 14 11 8 5

61 56 52 46 38 36 30 25 21 16 14

No first-line XRT

First-line XRT

No. at risk

P

= .1

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time Since Diagnosis (years)

PFS (probability)

29 26 25 24 20 18 17 14 11 8 5

61 55 49 44 36 35 29 24 20 14 13

No first-line XRT

No first-line XRT

First-line XRT

No. at risk

B

A

P

= .6

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time Since Diagnosis (years)

PFS (probability)

No first-line XRT

First-line XRT

7 6 6 6 5 4 4 3 2 1 1

40 36 29 21 17 13 9 6 5 4 2

First-line XRT

No first-line XRT

First-line XRT

No. at risk

P

= .3

0.25

0.50

0.75

1.00

0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Time Since Diagnosis (years)

OS (probability)

7 7 6 6 5 4 4 4 2 1 1

39 37 34 27 23 18 13 9 8 5 2

No. at risk

D

C

No first-line XRT

First-line XRT

No first-line XRT

First-line XRT

Fig 3.

Value of adjuvant post-operative

fi

rst-line external-beam irradiation (XRT) in EPN_PFB. (A) Progression-free survival (PFS) and (B) overall survival (OS) of EPN_PFB

across the Global Ependymoma Network of Excellence, St Jude

s, and Collaborative Ependymoma Research Network cohorts. (C) PFS and (D) OS of EPN_PFB across the

Burdenko cohort.

P

values determined using log-rank test.

6

© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

J

OURNAL OF

C

LINICAL

O

NCOLOGY

Ramaswamy et al

from 139.18.224.1

Information downloaded from

jco.ascopubs.org

and provided by at UNIVERSITAETSKLINIKUM LEIPZIG on June 20, 2016

Copyright © 2016 American S ciety of Clinical Oncology. All rights reserved.