Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1595 / 1708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1595 / 1708 Next Page
Page Background

Phase II trial

Role of radiotherapy in anaplastic ependymoma in children

under age of 3 years: Results of the prospective German

brain tumor trials HIT-SKK 87 and 92

*

Beate Timmermann

a,b,

*

, Rolf-Dieter Kortmann

a

, Joachim Ku¨hl

c

, Stefan Rutkowski

c

,

Karin Dieckmann

e

, Christof Meisner

d

, Michael Bamberg

a

a

Department of Radiooncology, University of Tu¨bingen, Tu¨bingen, Germany

,

b

Division of Radiation Medicine, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen,

Switzerland

,

c

Children’s Hospital, University of Wu¨rzburg, Wu¨rzburg, Germany

,

d

Institute of Medical Information Processing, University of

Tu¨bingen, Tu¨bingen, Germany

,

e

Department of Radiooncology, General Hospital, Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Background and purpose

: To evaluate the outcome of very young children with anaplastic ependymoma after delayed

or omitted radiotherapy (RT).

Materials and methods

: Children under age of 3 years with anaplastic ependymoma were enrolled in the HIT-SKK 87

trial from 1987. After surgery, low-risk patients (R0, M0) received maintenance chemotherapy until elective RT at age of

three. In high-risk patients (R

C

, M

C

) intensive induction chemotherapy was followed by maintenance chemotherapy and

subsequently delayed RT. If there was, progression radiotherapy started immediately. In the HIT-SKK 92, trial MTX-based

chemotherapy was applied. RT was administered in non-responders only.

Results

: Thirty-four children with anaplastic ependymoma were eligible (age 1.0–33.0 months). All children received

chemotherapy. In 13 children, no RT was administered. Preventive RT after chemotherapy was given in nine, and salvage

RT in 12 children. OS and PFS rates after 3-year were 55.9 and 27.3%, respectively. Twenty-five children relapsed.

Positive impact on survival was observed in children with higher age, M0-stage, complete resection, and treatment with

radiotherapy. Without RT only 3/13, children survived.

Conclusion

: Delaying RT jeopardizes survival even after intensive chemotherapy. Predominant site of failure is the

primary tumor site. RT of the neuraxis should be omitted in localized disease.

q

2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 77 (2005) 278–285.

Keywords:

Very young children; Ependymomas; Radiation therapy; Chemotherapy

Ependymomas comprise between 5 and 10% of childhood

brain tumors

[37] .

The peak incidence is in the first 3 years of

life, where ependymoma account for up to 30% of childhood

brain tumors

[27,49]

. In children, therapy requires a careful

balance between toxicity and efficacy. In younger children,

the developing brain is very sensitive to any insult. This may

lead to severe late sequelae

[6,16,19,22,23,32,42] .

On the

other hand, the prognosis in very young children is

particularly poor

[7,11,45] .

Many attempts have been made to increase survival while

reducing adverse side effects. Surgical resection of brain

tumors in babies and infants is often difficult

[5]

. The risk of

side effects of radiotherapy correlates inversely to the age of

the child

[42,43]

. In the past postoperative radiotherapy of

the whole central nervous system was standard treatment

for ependymoma

[27,40] .

In 1985, van Eys et al. reported the

use of postoperative chemotherapy to avoid radiotherapy for

infants

[46] .

Even though their results were not very

promising, many study groups started to delay radiation

therapy by early administration of chemotherapy.

We present an analysis of infants and babies enrolled in

prospective trials with postoperative chemotherapy. The

purpose of the report is to present the disease control results

for the very young children treated prospectively with

postoperative chemotherapy in an effort to delay or avoid

irradiation.

Materials and methods

In 1987, the German Pediatric Society for Hematology and

Oncology (GPOH) initiated a cooperative multi-institutional

0167-8140/$ - see front matter

q

2006 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2005.10.016

*

Presented at ECCO 12, Copenhagen, Denmark, 21–25.09.03.

Radiotherapy and Oncology 77 (2005) 278–285

www.thegreenjournal.com