Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1600 / 1708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1600 / 1708 Next Page
Page Background

radiotherapy

[12] .

Six of the total 15 children had anaplastic

histology and no further specific clinical parameters were

listed separately for ependymoma patients. In the series of

White et al., 5/14 children younger than 4 years of age with

ependymomas survived after receiving a VETOPEC-based

early chemotherapy

[49]

. All patients had M0 stage though,

and information about the proportions of anaplastic tumors

and irradiated patients is missing in the report. Radiotherapy

was reserved for relapse in the report of Ater et al., who

administered MOPP-Chemotherapy to infants less than 3

years of age

[1]

. Five ependymomas were included, two

survived; one of them received salvage radiotherapy.

Local control is the most important aspect of treatment

in ependymomas; most treatment failures occur locally.

Several trials have shown that complete surgery is a strong

prognostic factor in these tumors

[3,18,29,33,34,36,44,47]

.

In Children’s Cancer Group (CCG) Protocol 921, patients with

gross total resection had a 5-year progression free survival of

66%, compared to 11% for those with residual disease

[39] .

In

the analysis of the German HIT trials for children with

anaplastic ependymoma above 3 years of age, a 3-year PFS of

83.3% could be achieved after complete resection,

compared to only 38.5% after incomplete surgery

[44]

. In

our analysis, babies and infants receiving complete surgery

also show an advantage, with 3-year PFS of 41.2%, compared

to only 12.5% after incomplete resection. Still, the

importance of the operative procedure is very clear and

there have been groups reporting successful treatment of

intracranial ependymoma with surgery alone

[21]

. Palma et

al. reported that six out of 12 children survived without any

adjuvant therapy; only one child experienced late recur-

rence

[35] .

In young children omission of adjuvant, therapy

could significantly reduce the risk of late morbidity, thus,

potentially favoring an attempt to remove remaining tumor

at second surgery. On the other hand, the risks of aggressive

surgery are high in young children

[5]

and the role of surgery

without adjuvant radiation is still uncertain. Ependymomas

have not been supposed to be very chemo-responsive in the

past. In a randomized CCG trial for children over 3 years of

age, vincristine and lomustine were found to be of no benefit

for ependymoma

[10]

. In the CCG trial for infants, including

five children with measurable postoperative disease, no

child with intracranial ependymoma achieved complete or

even partial response after receiving chemotherapy

[12]

.

Response rates reported in other retrospective studies range

from 0 to 48%

[9,15] .

In the Australia–New Zealand trial,

seven children were evaluable for response to chemother-

apy, and six achieved either complete or partial response,

but only five of 14 children with ependymoma survived, none

of those with initial dissemination

[49] .

Duffner et al.

concluded from her re-analysis of the Baby-POG I trial that

ependymoma might be chemo-sensitive, but not chemo-

curable, because long delay of radiotherapy reduced survival

rates despite intensive interposed chemotherapy

[8]

. In our

series, only three out of 13 children treated with

chemotherapy alone survived.

Historically, surgery alone resulted in 5-year survival

rates of less than 30%, comprising all ranges of histological

grade and degree of surgery

[27] .

After employing adjuvant

irradiation routinely, survival could be improved signifi-

cantly, with survival rates of up to 60% in older children

[4,31,40,41,48]

. The irradiation volume encompassed the

whole neuraxis in most of the children, which led to

significant late sequelae

[16,17,19,22,23] .

Later trials

attempted to delay or omit radiation therapy in infants.

The Baby-POG I trial treated 48 children with intracranial

ependymoma under the age of 3 years. First analysis resulted

in promising 3-year overall survival rates of 61.8%

[9] .

These

findings did not persist. The children developed late

recurrences and new analysis revealed the benefit of not

delaying radiotherapy for any longer than 1 year, with 5-year

overall survival rates of 63.3%. When radiotherapy was

delayed for 2 years, 5-year overall survival rate was only

25.7%

[8] .

They concluded that delay of radiotherapy of

more than 1 year adversely affected survival. Several trials

tried to delay or avoid radiotherapy: the CCG trial by

administering postoperatively the ‘eight-in-one’ regimen,

the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center study MOPP chemother-

apy, and the Australia–New Zealand study by giving

Vincristine, etoposide and intensive cyclophosphamide. But

all of these studies included only 5–15 children and could not

lead to strong conclusions regarding radiotherapy

[1,12,49]

.

In our trial, the 3-year overall survival rate of 21 children

who were irradiated was 66.7%, compared to only 38.5% for

those receiving no radiotherapy. We failed to answer the

question if radiotherapy can be delayed until recurrence.

However, only two of nine children receiving radiotherapy

after developing progression survived without any further

progression. Nowadays, the irradiation of intracranial

ependymoma without dissemination has changed signifi-

cantly. Most of the brain tumor groups recommend

encompassing the tumor bed only, because as with our

findings, no benefit could be detected of irradiating the

whole CNS of patients with non-disseminated ependymoma

[2,40]

. This reduction of irradiated central nervous tissue

will lead to reduction of the risk of late sequelae. The

efficacy of chemotherapy is still unclear and the predomi-

nance of local failures indicates the need for local treatment

approaches. Therefore, we feel that the avoidance or long

delay of local radiotherapy even in young children with

ependymoma is not yet justified. This is in accordance with

the current Children’s Oncology Group trial (COG ACNS0121)

implementing RT even for very young children with localized

ependymoma

[30]

. Regarding the optimal doses for radio-

therapy, we cannot draw any conclusion from our analysis

because of the small group and inhomogeneous treatments.

Retrospective series indicate that total doses greater than

45 Gy must be delivered to the tumor site

[13,48] .

Merchant

et al. studied anaplastic ependymoma and found a positive

influence of increasing the local dose

[29] .

There is consensus that local relapse is the major cause of

failure in ependymoma

[3,18,29,33,34,36,44,47]

. In accord-

ance in our analysis, all children failed locally and, in 76% of

the cases, the site of failure was solely local.

Age at diagnosis was found to be an important prognostic

factor for ependymomas. In previous studies, children below

3–6 years had a lower survival rate than older patients

[14,33,38] .

There is little data concerning the impact of age

in the subgroup of infants and babies. Duffner et al. revealed

a significant difference between the two age groups (A: 0–24

months vs. B: 24–36 months) with 5-year survival rates of

25.7% compared to 63.3%, but the younger children had a

B. Timmermann et al. / Radiotherapy and Oncology 77 (2005) 278–285

283