Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  1689 / 1708 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 1689 / 1708 Next Page
Page Background

addition, different rates of change in test performance

were found over time in patients versus controls, such

that the performance of patients improved toward

normal over time. For example, the improvement over

time was faster for patients than for controls on verbal

memory but slower for patients than for controls on

motor speed

/

dexterity.

No significant group- or age-related differences were

revealed for recognition vocabulary (these results are not

included in Figs

2

and

3

).

Effect of Radiation Dose on Neuropsychological

Performance

Motor speed and dexterity (Purdue Pegboard

2-Hand).—

Among patients, motor speed and dexterity

decreased with increasing mean radiation dose to the

hippocampus (main LME analyses: left hippocampus,

dose:

P

¼

.049, visit:

P

¼

.023; right hippocampus,

dose:

P

¼

.032, visit:

P

¼

.014). Test performance also

decreased with increasing mean dose to the temporal

lobes (main LME analysis: left temporal lobe, dose:

P

¼

.033, visit:

P

¼

.021; right temporal lobe, dose:

P

¼

.015, visit:

P

¼

.017). At 6-month follow-up, raw

scores decreased with increasing doses to the left

and right hippocampi and temporal lobes (for all,

P

,

.045). At 15-month follow-up, the relationship

was significant for the temporal lobes (left,

P

¼

.020;

right,

P

¼

.010) and at 27-month follow-up, for the

right hippocampus (

P

¼

.036). Figures

4

and

5

illustrate

decreased motor speed

/

dexterity with increasing radia-

tion doses to the hippocampi and temporal lobes, respec-

tively, at 6-month follow-up. There was no significant

effect of mean dose to cerebrum (

P

¼

.46) or SVZ

(

P

.

.3) on performance. There was no significant

difference in performance on the test of motor speed

between patients with infratentorial versus supratento-

rial tumors (

P

¼

.37 at 6 mo,

P

¼

.55 at 15 mo, and

P

¼

.59 at 27 mo).

Verbal learning (WJ-III Memory for Words).—

Although the main analysis for verbal learning indicated

an overall effect of dose to cerebrum on test performance

(dose,

P

¼

.022; visit,

P

¼

.013; Age

RT

×

Dose,

Fig. 2. Age- and time-related changes in neuropsychological performance (raw scores) in patients and controls. The black “

+

” symbols

represent individual control data points and the gray “

×

” symbols represent individual patient data points. The results of the LME

regression analyses of age- and time-related differences in test scores between patients and controls are presented as solid lines. The

individual lines represent changes in test scores over time (27 mo) for patients (gray lines) and controls (black lines) of different ages.

Raw scores in both groups increased with age on the Purdue Pegboard 2-Hand test (1A), WJ-III Memory for Words (1B), Bead Memory

(1C), and visual perception test (1D) (all

P

,

.001). Improvement in test performance on the Purdue Pegboard 2-Hand, WJ-III Memory

for Words, and visual perception tests over the 27-mo period was most prominent in younger children. However, despite overall

improvement over time, younger patients had more pronounced cognitive deficits.

Redmond et al.: Radiation to neural progenitor niches and neurocognitive outcomes

364

NEURO-ONCOLOGY

M A R C H 2 0 1 3

at Universitaet Leipzig, Institut fuer Informatik/URZ, Bibliothek on August 25, 2014

http://neuro-oncology.oxfordjournals.org/

Downloaded from