![Show Menu](styles/mobile-menu.png)
![Page Background](./../common/page-substrates/page0155.jpg)
There were several notable clinical factors associated
with HRQOL. Consistently, individuals with comorbid
conditions, higher stages of cancer, and continued need for
a feeding tube reported poorer HRQOL on all domains
except social well-being. This result is consistent with a
large study by Terrell et al.,
26
who found that feeding tube
status and comorbid conditions were strong predictors of
HRQOL, and that stage of cancer was a moderate predic-
tor of HRQOL. The acute effects of radiation therapy had
a negative impact on physical and functional well-being
and increased HNC-associated symptoms. The literature
supports this finding: irradiation has been associated with
several side effects, including dry mouth, difficulty swal-
lowing, mouth and gum sores, fatigue, nausea, and lym-
phedema.
9,28–31,43
Our study found that the detrimental
effects of radiation therapy lessened over the years such
that Functional HRQOL was similar to those who were
not irradiated by 2 years, and physical well-being was sim-
ilar between those who did and didn’t receive radiation
therapy by four or five years postdiagnosis.
Limitations
There were several limitations of this study. All partici-
pants were receiving care in North Carolina. Although the
sample was heterogeneous with respect to race, socioeco-
nomic status, and clinical factors, it may not be generalizable
to the U.S. population. The measures of HRQOL were added
to the study after the parent study had begun, thus resulting
in lower sample sizes at the baseline 3-month (median)
assessment point. We did not have a pretreatment measure
of HRQOL to know to what extent HRQOL differences
existed prior to treatment. Future studies are recommended
to better understand the factors associated with HRQOL in
HNC patients. Strengths include the population-based rela-
tively large sample size and diverse population with multiple
follow-up surveys. Human papillomavirus infection has been
shown to be a risk factor for HNC, especially cancer of the
base of tongue, tonsils, and oropharynx.
44
We did not have
HPV data on all cases included in this analysis, and because
its potential association with HRQOL is mediated only
through treatment, we did not consider HPVas a covariate.
CONCLUSION
Despite these limitations, this study contributes to
the literature by identifying sociodemographic, behav-
ioral, and clinical factors associated with poorer HRQOL
for HNC survivors. Understanding these factors will
help to identify those at risk for decrements in HRQOL.
Some factors, such as tobacco use, can be modifiable by
encouraging patients to participate in smoking cessation
program. For other factors, awareness of these factors
can help to identify those at risk and provide more long-
term care and surveillance to reduce the deleterious
effects of the cancer and its treatment. The acute ill
effects of radiation therapy on HRQOL seem to decrease
significantly over time and return to levels seen in non-
irradiated patients by 2 to 4 years posttherapy.
Enhanced psychological and social support may help
with issues of depression and dealing with the physical
effects of surgery and radiation.
45
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Brown LM, Gridley G, Devesa SS. Descriptive epidemiology: U.S. patterns.
In: Olshan AF, ed. Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Prevention of Head
and Neck Cancer. New York, NY: Springer; 2010:23–39.
2. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2015. Atlanta, GA:
American Cancer Society; 2015.
3. Beadle BM, Liao KP, Elting LS, et al. Improved survival using intensity-
modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancers: a SEER-
Medicare analysis.
Cancer
2014;120:702–710.
4. Chera BS, Eisbruch A, Murphy BA, et al. Recommended patient-reported
core set of symptoms to measure in head and neck cancer treatment tri-
als.
J Natl Cancer Inst
2014;106. pii: dju127. doi:
10.1093/jnci/dju127.5. List MA, Ritter-Sterr CA, Baker TM, et al. Longitudinal assessment of
quality of life in laryngeal cancer patients.
Head Neck
1996;18:1–10.
6. Mochizuki Y, Matsushima E, Omura K. Perioperative assessment of psy-
chological state and quality of life of head and neck cancer patients
undergoing surgery.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg
2009;38:151–159.
7. Neilson KA, Pollard AC, Boonzaier AM, et al. Psychological distress
(depression and anxiety) in people with head and neck cancers.
Med J
Aust
2010;193(5 suppl):S48–S51.
8. Sawada NO, de Paula JM, Sonobe HM, Zago MM, Guerrero GP, Nicolussi
AC. Depression, fatigue, and health-related quality of life in head and
neck cancer patients: a prospective pilot study.
Support Care Cancer
2012;20:2705–2711.
9. Penedo FJ, Traeger L, Benedict C, et al. Perceived social support as a pre-
dictor of disease-specific quality of life in head-and-neck cancer patients.
J Support Oncol
2012;10:119–123.
10. Duffy SA, Terrell JE, Valenstein M, Ronis DL, Copeland LA, Connors M.
Effect of smoking, alcohol, and depression on the quality of life of head
and neck cancer patients.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry
2002;24:140–147.
11. Bloom EL, Oliver JA, Sutton SK, Brandon TH, Jacobsen PB, Simmons
VN. Post-operative smoking status in lung and head and neck cancer
patients: association with depressive symptomatology, pain, and fatigue.
Psychooncology
2015;24:1012–1019.
12. Duffy SA, Ronis DL, Valenstein M, et al. Depressive symptoms, smoking,
drinking, and quality of life among head and neck cancer patients.
Psy-
chosomatics
2007;48:142–148.
13. Fang FM, Chiu HC, Kuo WR, et al. Health–related quality of life for naso-
pharyngeal carcinoma patients with cancer–free survival after treat-
ment.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
2002;53:959–968.
14. Morse DE, Psoter WJ, Baek LS, et al. Smoking and drinking in relation to
depressive symptoms among persons with oral cancer or oral epithelial
dysplasia.
Head Neck
2010;32:578–587.
15. Ronis DL, Duffy SA, Fowler KE, Khan MJ, Terrell JE. Changes in quality
of life over 1 year in patients with head and neck cancer.
Arch Otolaryn-
gol Head Neck Surg
2008;134:241–248.
16. Allison PJ. Alcohol consumption is associated with improved health-
related quality of life in head and neck cancer patients.
Oral Oncol
2002;38:81–86.
Fig. 2. FACT-G Head and Neck Cancer Symptoms scores over
time for those who received radiation therapy and those who did
not receive radiation therapy. The adjusted means were calculated
with the covariates taking the values at the proportions presented
in Table I. The outside lines are 95% confidence interval lines.
FACT-G
5
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General.
Reeve et al.: Factors Associated With Quality of Life
135