Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  86 / 220 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 86 / 220 Next Page
Page Background

difference in late toxicity

[2]

. This result, combined with data from

the National Cancer Database suggesting a downward trend in

overall survival as chemoradiation was adopted has led some to

consider the possibility that long-term toxicity unaccounted for

on trial led late toxic deaths

[3]

. Late toxicity is difficult to measure

and was reported as a maximum grade in RTOG 91-11 without

comment on the timing or precise nature of the toxic events. The

purpose of this report is to perform a detailed analysis of the

cumulative incidence of late dysphagia observed after concurrent

chemoradiation for larynx cancer in an attempt to identify its con-

tribution to late mortality.

Methods

Patients

From an IRB-approved head and neck database all patients trea-

ted with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy at our institu-

tion between 1993 and 2013 who met eligibility criteria for

RTOG 91-11 were retrospectively identified. The criteria included

medically-fit patients with previously untreated squamous cell

carcinoma of the glottis or supraglottis, stage III-IVB by AJCC ver-

sion 3 criteria

[4]

, the version in place during 91-11 accrual.

Patients with disease classified as T4 due to soft-tissue extension

beyond the larynx were excluded from RTOG 91-11 and hence

the current study as well. Patients with T4 disease with

6

1 cm

invasion into the base of tongue were included.

Treatment

All patients were treated with definitive concurrent chemora-

diotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of multi-agent cisplatin and

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the earlier years and single-agent cisplatin

in the later years. Combination chemotherapy was given in two

cycles of a 4-day continuous infusion of cisplatin 20 mg/m

2

/day

and fluorouracil 1000 mg/m

2

/day. Single-agent chemotherapy

was given as a bolus of cisplatin 100 mg/m

2

on weeks 1, 4 and 7

of radiotherapy. All patients were programmed to receive 70 Gy

or greater of radiotherapy. In the early years twice-daily (BID)

radiotherapy was often delivered to doses of 72–74.4 Gy for

tumors of T3 or greater extent along with concurrent cisplatin

and fluorouracil

[5,6]

. Prior to 2009, radiotherapy was delivered

using standard conventional techniques including opposed lateral

fields matched to an anteroposterior supraclavicular field. In

2009, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) became the radio-

therapy technique of choice at our institution. After completion of

therapy an adjuvant neck dissection was performed for select

patients within three months for patients with residual adenopa-

thy at the discretion of the treating surgeon. Patients were subse-

quently followed by our multidisciplinary team as per National

Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines

[7]

.

Severe late dysphagia, other toxicity and the cause of death

The goal of this study was to provide a detailed description of

the incidence and timing of severe late dysphagia (SLD) in this

patient cohort. Therefore, individual multidisciplinary follow-up

encounters documented in the electronic medical record were

investigated for signs of severe dysphagia and other late toxicity.

Ninety days after the completion of radiotherapy was used as the

definition of ‘‘late” events as per RTOG 91-11. Severe late dyspha-

gia was defined as the occurrence of one or more of the following

events 90 days after the completion of treatment or beyond: pha-

ryngeal stricture dilation, admission to the hospital with a diagno-

sis of aspiration pneumonia or placement of a new feeding tube.

Feeding-tube dependence greater than one year after treatment

was also included in the definition of severe late dysphagia. This

composite endpoint is similar to a previous cooperative group

time-to-event analysis of physician-reported severe late dysphagia

[8]

. Furthermore, these events all correlate with the Common Ter-

minology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 and RTOG

scoring criteria used by RTOG 91-11 but offer a more specific

definition.

In order to evaluate the incidence of death associated with sev-

ere late dysphagia and subsequent aspiration pneumonia, special

attention was paid to the cause of death. Patients who expired after

metastatic or locoregional failure that could not be salvaged were

counted as a primary cancer death regardless of any dysphagia

events occurring after failure. For patients who expired outside of

the hospital system, the death certificate was obtained if possible

through the Ohio death registry.

Statistical analysis

This was a single-cohort retrospective study. Overall survival

and the cumulative incidence of salvage laryngectomy, locore-

gional failure and distant metastatic failure were assessed using

the Kaplan-Meier method measuring time from the date of diagno-

sis to the date of event or last oncologic follow-up. The cumulative

incidence of severe late dysphagia and its four components (eso-

phageal stricture requiring dilation, placement of a new feeding

tube, hospital admission for aspiration pneumonia or feeding tube

dependence beyond one year) was calculated using Gray’s compet-

ing risk analysis treating death or disease recurrence as competing

events

[9]

. Time was measured from the end of radiotherapy to the

first SLD event, with patients censored from the analysis at the

time of the last multidisciplinary follow-up. Although late toxicity

was the primary outcome of interest in this study, patients with

short follow-up or who did not complete therapy were not

excluded in order to capture deaths that may have occurred from

acute toxicity. The cause of death was compared with the data

reported by RTOG 91-11 on a per-patient basis using the Pearson

Chi-square test. To investigate for factors associated with severe

late dysphagia, relevant patient, tumor and treatment variables

were entered into a competing risk regression as described by Fine

and Gray with severe late dysphagia as the endpoint of interest

[10]

. All hypothesis testing was performed with significance

assumed at the 0.05 level. Statistical analyses were performed

using JMP Version 10 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and com-

peting risk analyses were performed using R statistical software

(R Foundation, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Patient characteristics

Between 1993 and 2013, 84 patients were identified who met

the inclusion criteria. Patient, disease and treatment characteristics

are represented in

Table 1

. The majority of tumors were located in

the supraglottis (71%), classified as T3 (78%) and were node-

positive (63%). Combination cisplatin with 5-FU was the most com-

mon concurrent chemotherapy regimen (76%).

The median follow-up for survivors was 54 months (range

8.8–180). Twenty-eight patients (33%) were followed beyond

5 years and 13 (15%) were followed beyond 9 years. A median of

14 individual oncologic follow-up visits were recorded (range

0–44), totaling 1240 individual oncologic visits for the entire

cohort. Fifty patients (60%) have experienced either severe late

dysphagia or a competing event (failure or death) and further

follow-up of these patients will not alter the incidence of severe

M.C. Ward et al. / Oral Oncology 57 (2016) 21–26

66