GAZETTE
JULY/AUGUST
1990
BOOK
REVIEWS
T H E I R I SH L EGAL S Y S T EM
[By R. Byrne & J.R McCutcheon.
Bu t t e rwo r th (Ireland) Limited.
374pp + xxxix. Price: IRE25.00]
This is the second edition of this
cases and materials book, which
has already proved its value to Irish
students of commerce and law.
It covers a wider range of topics
than its predecessor.
The first edition concentrated on
an overview of the organisation and
structure of the Irish legal system,
w i t h chap t e rs on precedent,
legislation, and cons t i t u t i onal
judicial review. This edition deals in
a more extensive fashion with the
legal profession, court systems and
procedures, access, remedies,
tribunals and adjudicative bodies,
and the impact of EC and inter-
national law.
This edition also appears to
attempt a greater degree of com-
parison between emerging trends
in Irish law by contrast with de-
velopments in English and, to a
lesser degree, other jurisdictions.
Independent of this project, the
t wo au t ho rs have published
extensively on a variety of topics of
Irish law, and their familiarity with
judicial and legislative develop-
ments, acquired in other scholarly
ven t u r es, con t r i bu t es to the
authority of this book.
The first eleven chapters set the
legal scene by describing the
outline of Irish law. The last three
chapters deal wi th precedent,
interpretation of legislation and the
Constitution and Constitutional
rights. These each comprise (1) a
concenxratedly-written introduction
to the subject, (2) comprehensive
and erudite pointers to further
reading (could these be inserted in
a more systematic way in the third
edition - "further reading" at the
end of each section with a ten or
twenty word synopsis of what the
student should take from the article
in question?) and (3) selected
extracts from what the authors
consider important, up-to-date
cases.
Are the cases selected appropri-
ate and useful? Yes they are. Is the
commentary helpful and accurate?
Again, yes. Do the cases and the
commentary combine together,
enabling the reader to make
informed judgments about the
judicial process? In general, yes, but
I think that in places there are gaps
between the commentary and the
cases, gaps so wide that the reader
is left on his own to work out the
connections between the com-
mentary and the cases.
Consider the t r ea tment of
McGee, Norris
and
Murphy.
Behind
the issues in these cases, the
authors diagnose on p. 27 a
conflict between the utilitarian and
natural law principles in Consti-
t u t i onal i n t e r p r e t a t i on. They
mention this again later, posing a
number of stimulating questions for
the discerning student to ask in
considering the extracts. Case-law
germane to the judicial resolution of
the claims of interventionism and
personal liberty is quoted exten-
sively.
The effect of this spread bet-
ween commentary and case-law is
peculiar. It stresses the short-
comings of the Irish decisions, their
arbitrary and
ad hoc
bases. It does
not demonstrate how each case
achieves a sophisticated judicial
reconciliation of these particular
opposing claims. One wonders
whether all the judges have posed
such intelligent questions to
themselves as the authors of this
textbook recommend to the reader.
Whether more could have been
achieved by re-arranging the
commentary and the judgments, or
by the inclusion of more extensive
comment, or by taking judgments
from other jurisdictions which deal
in a more sophisticated judicial
manner with these problems, or by
a combination of all three is a vexed
question. Suffice to say, the reader
sees shortcomings without being
guided to better solutions. The
comment that " t he Murphy case
illustrated that . . . [the principles
of natural law] . . . may lurk in a
corner wa i t i ng to sp r i ng" is
insufficient elucidation of this
particular aspect of judicial
Constitutional interpretation.
A slightly different example of
the way in which the cases and
commentary do not match is
evident in the discussion of the
contemporary Irish judicial attitude
to the role of equity, noted briefly
on p. 12. It cannot be said that this
authorial perception informs the
selection of cases to be found later
on, yet surely this issue is of
practical importance in the forma-
tion of a view of Irish judicial
method.
Mi sp r i n t s, omi ss i ons
f r om
indices, and other shortcomings in
the physical production of books
are too often facilely ascribed to
hapless writers rather than to those
responsible for the commercial pro-
duction of the fruits of authorship.
In each of these respects, this text
deserved better from its publishers
than it got. The book has more than
its fair share of quite spectacular
(and in one case, obscene)
typographical errors, omissions etc.
This is not an insuperable impedi-
ment to the usefulness of the work.
The work is however the most
up-to-date, useful introduction to
the major features of the Irish legal
system, and no student beginning
law should be without it.
DR. DAV ID T O M K I N
MO D E RN LAW OF P E R S ON AL
PROPER TY IN E N G L A ND
A N D I R E L AND
[By A.P. Bell. Butterworth (Ireland)
Ltd. & Bu t t e r wo r th & Co.
(Publishers) Ltd. ixiv + 546 +
12pp. Price IRE49.50]
This book aims to examine in the
context of English and Irish law
wh a t i n t e r es ts may exist in
personal property.
It is in three parts. The first is
devoted to an analysis of property
and property rights and a definition
of personal property. The second
part deals with interests in personal
property, and is subdivided into an
analysis of possession, legal
ownership, bailment, possessory
security, equitable ownership, non-
189