Previous Page  217 / 436 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 217 / 436 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

JULY/AUGUST 1990

Entitlement to damages for

breach of community

legislation under English Law

PART I

The impetus for this article arose out of a question posed by Nial

Fennelly SC in a paper delivered by him to the Irish Centre for

European Law on 10th February. The question was whether it is

possible to obtain a remedy of damages in the UK for breaches of

Articles 85 or 86 of the Rome Treaty. I thought it would be

interesting to expand the question and look at the position not just

under Articles 85 and 86 but under other Articles of the EEC Treaty

and also secondary legislation. The question should be particularly

relevant for Irish lawyers and their clients since nearly 4 0% of Irish

exports still go to the United Kingdom and problems constantly

arise where the services or goods being supplied are in some way

restricted by acts of either the Government or competitors some

of whi ch may be infringements of either primary or secondary

Community legislation.

The following are examples of

different categories of situations

where this question arises:-

C A S E 1 -

Abuse of a dominant

position.

You are a trader of a commodity

(for example butter or cement) and

your supplier who has a monopoly

of the product refuses to continue

to supply to you or discriminates in

his

p r i c i ng

po l i cy

to

your

disadvantage. You argue that the

supplier is in breach of Article 86

of the E EC Treaty. Do you have a

remedy in damages for your loss?

C A S E

2

-

Impo r t /Expo rt

Restrictions

You are an exporter to the UK and

there is a UK Government decision

wh i ch either restricts your right to

export on the grounds that it does

not meet the health requirements

or restrictions are necessary for

reasons of public policy. If s uch

decisions are in breach of the E EC

Treaty do you have a right to

damages against the Government?

C A S E 3 -

Unfair award of public

contracts

You are a contractor in the UK and

you tender for a UK Local Authority

contract wh i ch you do not win

because your goods do not comply

with British standards and also you

think there wa s some discrimina-

tion in the award of the tender. The

tender has been awarded, you think

unfairly; can you seek recovery of

your loss of profit?

C A S E 4 -

Illegal state aid

You are a manufacturer competing

in an international market. One of

By

Philip Lee

So l i c i tor*

your competitors receives a sub-

stantial UK Government grant. This

allows him to sell at a cheaper price

than you. You suffer a loss in sales.

The Government grant was not

notified to the Commission. Can

you sue that relevant Government

for the damages or loss of profits

you suffer?

The above situations occur in

varying forms not infrequently. I

shall try and indicate the grounds

on which damages can be awarded

by an E n g l i sh C o u r t. Wh e re

damages or an injunction are not

available, the clients only remedy

may be for a declaration by way of

an application for judicial review

under the recent Order 53. Order

53 has severe limitations and time

c o n s t r a i n ts

w h i c h

an

Irish

practitioner must consider.

The possibilities of damages for

b r e a ch

by

i n d i v i d u a ls

and

Government bodies of Commun i ty

law raise s ome of the mo st

complex, and in some c a s es still

unanswered, questions in English

law. This itself is most surprising

since potential claims under these

" T he fact that some of these

issues remain unresolved points

perhaps to the slowness with

whi ch lawyers have informed

their clients of their rights and

remedies."

provisions have been in exist-

ence since 1973 when the UK

and Ireland joined the Common

Market. The fact that some of

these issues remain unresolved

points perhaps to the s l owne ss

with wh i ch lawyers have informed

their clients of their rights and

remedies.

B e c a u se the position is so

c omp l ex

I t h i nk

it wi ll

be

appreciated by the reader if I try

firstly to give a simple answer to

the four situations. In the second

half of this article I d i s cuss the

Philip Lee.

201