GAZETTE
JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1990
Practising Certificate limited to
enable the respondent practise
only whilst under the supervi-
sion and in the employment of
another solicitor to be approved
of by the Law Society.
Costs to the Society
1
Censured, fined and costs
2
* Fined and costs
2
Censured and costs
2-
Petitions struck out with
costs to the Society
2
Adjourned generally
1
Adjourned
1
Stay on Order - adjourned
for six months
1
*Fines ranged from £50 to
£1,000.
Cases adjourned by the Presi-
dent of the High Court last year7
Name of respondent struck
off the Roll of Solicitors
2
Remitted to the Disciplinary
Committee
1
Costs awarded to the
Society
1
Awaiting presentation to the
High Court
17
I would like to take this oppor-
tunity to distinguish the Dis-
ciplinary Committee's porocedures
from those of the Law Society
when dealing with complaints. The
Disciplinary Committee is an in-
dependent statutory committee
and its procedures are governed by
the Solicitors' Acts 1954 and
1960. Its members are appointed
by the President of the High Court
to investigate allegations of
misconduct made against solicitors
either by the Incorporated Law
Society of Ireland or by members
of the public.
There are two avenues open to
the profession as well as members
of the public if they wish to make
an allegation of misconduct against
a solicitor. They may do so either
by writing to the Registrar's Com-
mittee of the Incorporated Law
Society of Ireland or they may
make a direct application to the
Disciplinary Committee by way of
affidavit. Should this latter course
be taken the Clerk to the Commit-
tee will forward the appropriate
forms and explain the procedures
to the complainant.
The Law Society's Registrar's
Committee investigates complaints
made directly to the Society by
way of correspondence. In the
event that it wishes to report a
matter to the Disciplinary Com-
mittee it may do so by completing
the necessary application form and
affidavit.
Any person or body may make a
direct application to the Dis-
ciplinary Committee for an inquiry
into the conduct of a solicitor on
the grounds of alleged misconduct.
The majority of the Committee's
findings this year related to the
area of conveyancing. The com-
plaints in particular related to the
failure of the solicitor-respondents
to carry out routine procedures
such as stamping documents and
lodging them in the Land Registry.
Failure to communicate with
clients and/or the Law Society or
explain a situation to a colleague
were also a major feature of com-
plaints brought before the Commit-
tee. As Chairman of the Commit-
tee, I would urge all practitioners to
ensure that such simple tasks as
stamping documents etc. are car-
ried out as a matter of course.
It is the Committee's experience
that a key element in the preven-
tion of complaints is communica-
tion. In the majority of cases which
come before the Committee there
is always a complaint of failure to
communicate with a client and/or
the Society. It is the Committee's
experience that had a solicitor ex-
plained the situation to a client or
the Society the complaint may not
have been pursued. Therefore it is
in the interests of both the client
and the practitioner that there is
good and open communication bet-
ween them.
During the year Mr. Gerald
Hickey retired from the Committee.
Mr. Hickey was appointed to the
Committee in November 1980 and
I would like to thank him for his
hard work and dedication to the
Committee.
Mr. Terence Dixon was ap-
pointed to the Committee for a
period of five years from the 1st
June 1989.
My own period as Chairman of
the Committee has been extended
by the President of the High Court
for a further five years from 1st
February 1989.
I would like to thank all the
members of the Committee for
their hard work and note that while
the Committee met less frequent-
ly this year than in the previous
year, it dealt with the same number
of new applications.
Dated this 6th day of December
1QftQ
Walter Beatty
Chairman
f,—
\
P.L.M.
Photographic
Studios
Specialists in all aspects of
Legal and Corporate Photography
20, Stephen's Lane, Dublin 2.
Telephone: 761406/761088
Ttí'LS'LCONíP OLDESTCdXRJTy
Iltll&LMtP
'Providesfru brtaifast, dot dinners and teas
on 364 days ofeachyearfor the poor and
needy. 'We have to rely on thegenerosity
of the public..30 PLEASEtfLLP US TO
<MAÍ7&A INJFMS TfLCLSSXty SE%:
'Vice vyxzc&MMLNipi'Hg ou%_
CMWUTfTO yoWKCLITlNXS PMEOf
DpAJTI'Xg TtfLHCWlLLS.
VOHATIOMS OTiLEQACrLS TO-
The Mendicity institution Trust,
IslandStrut, Dublin 8.Tel:- (01) 773308.
ISLE OF MAN & TURKS
& CAICOS ISLANDS
MESSRS SAMUEL Mc CLEERY
Solicitors, Attorneys-at-Law of the Turks
and Caicos Islands, Registered Legal prac-
tioners in the Isle of Man of 1 Castle
Street,Castletown, Isle of Man, will be
pleased to accept instructions by their
senior resident partner, Mr. Samuel
McCleery from Irish Solicitors in the forma-
tion of resident and non-resident I.O.M.
Companies and exempt Turks and Caicos
Island Companies.
Irish Office.
26 South Frederick Street, Dublin 2.
Telephone: 01 -760780 Fax: 01 -764037.
I.O.M. Office:
Telephone : 0624-822210
Telex : 628285.
Fax : 0624-823799
London
Office:
Telephone : 01 -8317761.
Telex : 297100 Fax : 01-8317485.
James Nash
F.S.S. DÍ
P
.
Forensic Document
Exeminer
end
Hendwriting
Consultant
38, Monastery Rise,
Clondalkin, Dublin 22.
Telephone: (01) 571323
16