Previous Page  332 / 436 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 332 / 436 Next Page
Page Background

GAZETTE

DECEMBER 1990

members to face the future in a

self-critical way, dedicating itself to

the provision of a quality service in

return for a proper reward. The next

two to three years should see out

" t he main battles between the Bar

and the Law Society". He thinks

that, when this is over, serious

consideration should be give to

"abolishing both the Law Society

and the General Council of the Bar"

and replacing them with a single

legal body encompassing bar-

risters, solicitors, legal executives

and maybe even licenced con-

veyancers. Some practitioners on

this side of the water may well be

surprised that a General Secretary

could publicly air such views but I

had the impression, from the res-

ponse his address received and also

knowing the reputation that John

Hayes enjoys in the profession, that

many endorse his view of his own

role as that of an

ideas

man and a

person whose job it is to act as a

catalyst for new thinking.

Ken Pritchard echoed much of

what Tony Holland said and called

for the " f u s i o n" of the t wo

branches of the profession in

Scotland. He predicted that there

would be a united legal profession

in the United Kingdom in 25 years,

though regional differences might

remain. The two branches of the

profession should be united to face

the future, to face also competition

and, indeed, the Government. In an

even more radical vein, from the

Scottish prospective, Mr. Pritchard

said distinctions between legal sys-

tems would have to be viewed in

the European Community context.

Conceding that this kind of talk

was heresy for many Scots lawyers,

he said " I know that the law is part

of our Scottish National Heritage

but the world is getting smaller".

He has a broadly similiar view of

the role of Law Societies as John

Hayes though, of course, the issues

facing the legal profession in

Scotland are somewhat different

from those in England. Ken liberally

dispensed his own keen brand of

Scottish humour in the course of

his contribution, which was serious

though at times amusing, and

rounded it off with a preview of

some of the new thirty second

television commercials which the

Scottish Law Society will shortly

be launching under the general

theme of " I t 's never too early to

consult your solicitor".

Civil Litigation in the 90s

For many, the session on Saturday

morning, 20th October, chaired by

the Lord Chancellor, Lord Mackay of

Clashfern, on civil litigation was

perhaps the most interesting. A

very large proportion of the

audience seemed to be lawyers

who specialised in civil litigation

and it appeared that few of them

were disappointed with what they

heard. The Lord Chancellor con-

fined himself primarily to a few

introductory remarks, presented

the speakers, and chaired the sub-

sequent open forum discussion.

The principal speaker was the

Right Honourable Lord Griffiths

who is a Lord of Appeal in Ordinary

since 1985 and who has been a

member of the Chancellor's Law

Reform Committee since 1976. He

has just recently been appointed to

oversee the introduction of reforms

to civil litigation procedures in the

courts.

Outlining the shape of things to

come, he said that the principal

objective of the reform measures

would be to outlaw the sytem of

"trial by ambush" which has for so

long dominated the common law

approach to civil litigation. This

would be achieved by having more

informative pleadings, early dis-

covery and all witness statements

disclosed. "Bluff and guesswork"

would be completely out, he said.

The great majority of civil cases

turn on issues of fact not law and,

in the new order, lawyers will no

longer be able to hold their cards as

close to their chests as heretofore.

Both sides will be able to review all

the evidence before the trial and

assess better their chances of

success. This will also have the

e f f ect of encou r ag i ng more

settlements.

The reforms will also affect

existing

judicial

practices. The

judge will review all evidence

before the trial and will hold a brief

discussion with lawyers for both

sides to identify the crucial issues

that will require oral argument.

Lawyers will be confined to a recital

of skeleton arguments citing

authorities; the present practice of

long, one-sided recitals of facts will

be abolished.

Lord Griffiths recognised, how-

ever, that some complex cases

would not readily yield to the new

approach and these cases would

have to continue to receive special

TURKS AND CAICOS

ISLANDS AND

THE ISLE OF MAN

Samuel McCleery

Attorney - at - Law and Solicitor of PO Box

127 in Grand Turk,Turks and Caicos Islands,

British West Indies and at 1 Castle Street,

Castletown, Isle of Man will be pleased to

accept instructions generally from Irish

Solicitors in the formation and administration

of Exempt Turks and Caicos Island

Companies and Non - Resident Isle of Man

Companies as well as Trust Administration

G.TOffice:-

Tel: 809 946 2818

Fax: 809 946 2819

I.O.M.Office:-

Tel: 0624 822210

Telex : 628285 Samdan G

Fax: 0624 823799

individual treatment. The judges,

he said, would be empowered to

compel adherence to the new

system and their principal sanction

would be to disallow costs where

unnecessary issues had been

raised. The system would continue,

however, to maintain the Socratic

dialogue, recognising the value of

cross-examination in elucidating

the truth. Lord Griffiths said that

the truth would, in the future as in

the past, "leak out of a lying

affidavit like water from a leaking

bucket".

Other major features of the

reforms would be:

- greater transfer of jurisdiction

from the High Court to the

County Court - the bulk of

personal injury cases (up to

£50,000 in damages) will be

tried in the County Court in

future,

- solicitors will have enhanced

advocacy rights though many

will continue to use the bar

preferring to (because it is more

profitable) concentrate on other

non-contentious business,

- use of what were termed 'court

controlled case management

techniques'. Using modern

computer technology, the aim

would be to 'track' the stages

of an action against a given

timetable. This will facilitate

intervention such as reminders

to parties to 'get on with it' or .

risk a striking out,

- use of video links to lawyers'

offices would be examined,

- greater emphasis on orderly

listing and earlier trials which

3 1 6