Previous Page  90 / 116 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 90 / 116 Next Page
Page Background

88

The Gazette of the Incorporated Law Society of Ireland.

[FEB., 1908

present appeal was brought; but the only items

in respect of which the plaintiffs persevered in

the appeal were items 80 and 81—viz., the fees

of

£4.

4-r. each paid to Dr. Burke Savage and

Surgeon Kennedy.

These gentlemen had

attended the deceased when he came up to

Dublin to undergo an operation, shortly before

his death, and prior to the making of his will.

They had been summoned as witnesses under

the direction of senior counsel; and the two

items of ^4 4^. were expressed to be for con

sultation and reports on the mental condition

of the testator prior to the date of the making

of the will. The bill of costs furnished by the

plaintiffs' solicitors contained the

following

statement :—" When it became known that the

defendant's case was grounded on the alle

gation of deceased's insanity, the executors

were entirely at a loss to understand what

particular form of insanity (if any) was alleged.

The correspondence between the solicitors on

both sides with reference to the case did not

touch upon

the matter. Consequently the

solicitors for the plaintiffs were driven to pre

pare to rebut at the trial any allegations that

could possibly be made as to the deceased's

insanity. Had the executors known that the

defendant was going to make the case that

deceased was suffering from a particular form

of mania, the working up of the plaintiffs' case

would have been more simple." The Taxing

Master, in the exercise of his .discretion, dis

allowed the two items on the ground that the

special reports were unnecessary, and did not

appear to have been of any benefit in the case.

The Court unanimously dismissed the appeal

on the ground that there was no good reason

for interfering with the order made by Andrews,

J., and by consent measured the costs of the

appeal at ;£io loj.

Reported in I.L.T.R., Vol. XLII., page 2.

Labourers (Ireland) Act, 1906.

AN application was made upon the 22nd of

January to His Honor Judge Barry, sitting at

Bray, in some cases heard by him at Naas,

in which he had granted petitions against

Rural District Councils, and had directed

schemes to be amended by striking out cer

tain lands proposed to be acquired for the

purposes of the Labourers (Ireland) Act, 1906,

that the costs of the petitioners, which he had

directed' to be paid by the Rural District

Councils, should be taxed under the higher

scale relating to equity proceedings under the

County Courts (Ireland) Orders.

Rule 15 of

the Provisional County Court Rules of Z4th

Isfovember, 1906, regulating procedure in the

County Court under the Labourers (Ireland)

Act, 1906, is as follows :—"The costs payable

under any order of a County Court Judge shall,

if not otherwise prescribed under these rules,

be in all cases in his discretion ; but, in fixing

the amount, regard shall be had, so far as prac

ticable, to the amount of costs which may be

awarded in analogous cases in the equity juris

diction of the County Court Judges. All costs

which are taxed shall be taxed under the Rules

and Schedule of Fees relating to equity pro

ceedings under the County Courts (Ireland)

Orders. Where no fees are thereby provided

for any work done under these Rules the fees

thereby fixed for analogous work shall be

applicable."

Judge Barry directed that the costs of the

petitioners should be taxed under the higher

scale of the Schedule of Fees relating to

equity proceedings under the County Courts

(Ireland) Orders.

Irish Land Act, 1903.

THE following Memorandum for counsel with

reference to the investigation of title by them

for the purposes of section 17 of the Irish Land

Act, 1903, and the giving of Certificates on the

Form T to the Rules of the Estates Commis

sioners dated the 4th November, 1907, has

been approved of by the Hon. Mr. Justice

Wylie :—

The object of counsel's certificate is

to

satisfy the Estates Commissioners that the

vendor is a person having power to sell under

the Land Purchase Acts the lands set forth in

the ist Schedule to the originating application

or request, and thus enable them, subject to

the advertisements and notices prescribed by

their rules, without any further investigation of

title, to deal with vendors as the owners of

their estates for all purposes other than the

distribution of the purchase-money or the pay

ment of any percentage out of the Land

Purchase Aid Fund.

Counsel is not concerned with

the actual

form of agreement which may have been

entered into between a vendor and his tenants,

or the agreement which may be in contempla

tion between a vendor and the Estates Com

missioners- :•••-"

:

:

'

:

'