Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  23 / 74 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 23 / 74 Next Page
Page Background

23

4.5. Seabed inner shelf (0–50m)

The seabed inner shelf is mainly under threat from trawling

activities. However, this habitat is in good condition and

is improving.

4.6. Seabed outer shelf (50–200m)

The seabed outer shelf will possibly be affected in the

future from offshore oil extraction activities. However, this

habitat is assessed to be currently in very good condition

and stable in the past 5 years.

4.7. Water column shoreline (0–20m)

Possible threats for the water column in the shallow areas

near the shoreline include fishing, waste disposal and

habitat degradation due to pollution. However, this habitat

is in good condition and is in stable condition the past

5 years.

4.8. Water column inner shelf (20–50m)

Possible threats for the water column in the inner shelf

areas include fishing activities, waste disposal and habitat

degradation due to pollution. This habitat is assessed to be

in good condition and stable the past 5 years.

4.9. Water column outer shelf (50–200m)

Possible threats for the water column in the outer shelf

areas include fishing activities, waste disposal and habitat

degradation due to pollution. This habitat is assessed to be

in good condition.

4.10. Mangroves

Forest resources in the coastal zone are exploited for a

variety of uses. Prominent amongst these is the fuel wood

trade in mangrove forest wood as well as poles for building

and other purposes. Coastal forests are exploited for boat

building and handicraft. Oyster farming from mangroves

and other hard sub-strata is another activity of coastal

dwellers. Oysters are harvested for both commercial and

subsistence purposes.

Peri-urban agricultural practices are common in Sierra

Leone and are a usual feature of the coastal area. Swamp

rice is one of the main crops cultivated in the coastal area.

In some areas notably in the Kambia district, rice has been

cultivated in areas previously occupied by mangroves.

Mangrove areas have also been cleared for salt extraction.

The mangroves are generally in a good condition alongmost

parts of the coastline. In other parts, mangroves have been

decimated due to conversion to other uses. The best places

are found along parts of the Sierra Leone River Estuary, the

Jong and Moa rivers. The worst places include the Scarcies

river estuary, Ribbi and Kargboro creeks.

4.11. Mudflats

Mudflats in general are in good condition in areas along the

Freetown peninsula and parts of the northern and southern

sectors of the coastline. However, shelter construction is

threatening the stability of mudflats near Freetown. Garbage

and debris also contribute to the degradation of mudflats.

4.12. Offshore banks, Shoals and Islands

These structural habitat systems currently face little or no

pressure and are therefore assessed to be in in very good

condition and stable. The confidence in grade is high and

for the above submission is derived mainly from project

reports and studies as well as from Environmental Impact

Assessment studies.

4.13. Coastal lagoons

The drainage system consists of a series of rivers fromnorth

to south including Great Scarcies, Little Scarcies, Rokel,

Jong, Sewa, Moa and Mano and their associated estuaries.

The coastal water resources include the bays and estuaries of

the rivers of the Rokel (Sierra Leone River), Great and Little

Scarcies, Sherbro, Jong, Sewa, Moa andMano. Nearly all these

rivers flow parallel to one another right across the country

from the high interior plateau in the east towards the lowland

coastal areas before debauching into the Atlantic Ocean.

In general, coastal lagoons are in very good condition.

In some areas, incidents of pollution have been reported

although not serious. These areas are found mainly

downstream of mining areas.

4.14. Summary (habitat assessment)

Thirteen habitat types were assessed at the workshop. The

average score for the habitats indicates a good condition

for most places (Fig. 4.2). The condition of the habitats is

assessed to be stable in the last 5 years.

Figure 4.2:

Summary table of the habitat assessment.

Average, high and low scores for the condition assessment in

the Best 10 %, Most (80 %) and Worst 10 % of places