Previous Page  10 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 10 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

American Society

of Clinical Oncology

2017 Annual Meeting

2–6 JUNE 2017 • CHICAGO, USA

At this year’s ASCO annual

meeting, the PracticeUpdate

Editorial team spoke to some

of oncology’s most esteemed

minds for their thoughts

on key clinical trial data

presented at the meeting,

and those they considered

practice changers.

Practice changers in advanced prostate cancer:

STAMPEDE, LATITUDE vis-à-vis CHAARTED

Dr Farzanna Haffizulla speaks with Oliver A Sartor MD, Laborde

Professor in Cancer Research in the Medicine and Urology

Departments at Tulane School of Medicine in Louisiana, on the

STAMPEDE, LATITUDE and CHAARTED trials and what they

mean for men with prostate cancer.

Dr Haffizulla:

I wanted to talk about the most

recent data from STAMPEDE. We’re here at

ASCO 2017 and I know in STAMPEDE we’re

assessing abiraterone in the context of hor-

mone-sensitive prostate cancer. What does

this data mean for clinical practice?

Dr Sartor:

I think it’s practice changing.

The utilization of ADT has been ongo-

ing since 1941 and it’s sort of the standard

that we’ve become accustomed to. There

was a clinical trial called CHAARTED that

helped change that standard by adding

in chemotherapy and STAMPEDE had

another arm that added in chemotherapy.

But the new data is with abiraterone, and

it’s being compared against conventional

ADT. It’s really strikingly positive, and within

the metastatic subset almost a reduction of

40%; it’s like a 39% reduction in mortality.

It’s pretty reasonably well tolerated.

The PFS and other components of the

endpoints were all strikingly positive, and

I think it’s a practice changer. I think peo-

ple are going to be looking at abiraterone

with a low-dose prednisone, only 5 mg of

prednisone, add it to ADT as being a new

potential standard of care.

Dr Haffizulla:

How does this data differ from

LATITUDE?

Dr Sartor:

Well, the LATITUDE is a little bit

more restricted, so what I didn’t tell you

about STAMPEDE is it also took the non-

metastatic patients, and I personally feel

as though the nonmetastatic patients

don’t have adequate maturity to be con-

clusive. Their failure-free survival is very

strongly positive on the abiraterone, but

their overall survival and then the hazard

ratio was good at 0.75. Confidence level

is still big and not a lot of maturity in that.

So, STAMPEDE actually took in a lot of the

nonmetastatic patients.

CONFERENCE COVERAGE

10

PRACTICEUPDATE ONCOLOGY