Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  4 / 48 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 4 / 48 Next Page
Page Background

2

CONSTRUCTION WORLD

JANUARY

2015

>

COMMENT

EDITOR

Wilhelm du Plessis

constr@crown.co.za

ADVERTISING MANAGER

Erna Oosthuisen

ernao@crown.co.za

LAYOUT & DESIGN

Lesley Testa

CIRCULATION

Karen Smith

TOTAL CIRCULATION:

(Third Quarter ’14)

4 712

PUBLISHER

Karen Grant

PUBLISHED MONTHLY BY

Crown Publications cc

P O Box 140

BEDFORDVIEW, 2008

Tel: 27 11-622-4770 • Fax: 27 11-615-6108

The views expressed in this publication are not necessarily those of the editor or the publisher.

PRINTED BY

Tandym Cape

To add insult to injury, the powers-that-be

within Eskom have refused to admit that this

is an energy crisis. Yet, in the same breath, they

maintain that regular outages will be a part of

the South African reality for at least the next

two years.

Whether they want to admit it or not, the

country is in an energy crisis. Reports of massive

losses abound. Steel and Engineering Industries

Federation of Southern Africa (Seifsa) has urged

government and Eskom to bring an end to the

current bout of load shedding, which, in the first

three weeks, has cost the metals and engi-

neering sector an estimated R6-billion in

lost revenue.

The reality

This is what the current status quo is achieving:

the frequent energy supply shortages and

supply security uncertainty are damaging

South Africa’s international reputation as an

investment destination. The power outages

causes further harm to the country’s already

At the time of writing this

(December 2014), South Africa is

firmly in the grip of load shedding,

the likes of which the country

experienced in 2008 – when it was

classified as a major crisis. To make

matters worse, Eskom is subjecting

the public and industry to a ‘will-

they-or-will-they-not’ type of

schedule: completely unpredictable

outages which in the long run will

make it difficult to build a country.

ailing economy. It will render South Africa

globally uncompetitive.

Light and the end of a long

tunnel

Despite the doom and gloom (literally),

PwC recently announced that infrastructure

spend in sub-Saharan Africa will grow from

USD70-billion in 2013 to USD180-billion by

2025. This is according to the PwC’s report

on capital projects and infrastructure for East,

Southern and West Africa. This figure is double

the USD93-billion a year the World Bank says

Africa currently needs for infrastructure build.

South Africa and Nigeria spent 68% of

all infrastructure spend last year – followed

by Kenya (10%), Ghana (8%), Ethiopia (6%),

Tanzania (5%) and Mozambique (3%).

An interesting aspect of the report,

relevant in the current energy situation,

is that 48 countries in the region produce

84 GW of power (which is about the same

Spain produces) while only 10% of the sub-

Saharan region’s hydropower is being realised.

The report found that there is a growing

sense of longer term planning in the sub-Sa-

haran countries (something that was sorely

lacking in South Africa): some 75% of respon-

dents to the report (95) indicated that the

capital projects that were surveyed, formed

part of an overall infrastructure master plan for

specific countries.

This notwithstanding: the South African

energy crisis is real though – the Kusile

and Medupi power stations will only bring

relief in years to come. All South Africans

can do is hope that the effects of load shedding

only have minor impact.

Wilhelm du Plessis

Twitter: @ConstWorldSA