Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  365 / 435 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 365 / 435 Next Page
Page Background

Multi Laboratory Test – AOAC First Action Method 2012.22 Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin C) in Infant Formula and

Adult/Pediatric Nutritionals.

RDLS-RD150006

E. Campos Giménez (NRC, Lausanne)

Page 3

CONFIDENTIAL

The contents of this document constitute a trade secret and the intellectual property rights thereto belong to Nestlé S. A., Vevey, Switzerland.

This document may not be reproduced or disclosed to third parties without prior authorisation.

STUDY DESCRIPTION

Study Information

Study Title

Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) in Infant Formula and Adult/Pediatric Nutritional

Formula by UHPLC-UV, AOAC First Action 2012.22: Multi-Laboratory Study.

Study

Objective

The objective of the study was to validate the current method (AOAC First

Action 2012.22) by determining its precision figures (repeatability and

reproducibility) through a multi-laboratory testing (MLT). This is mandatory to

finalize the work in progress and go forward to obtain Final Action status.

Study

Director

Esther Campos Giménez

Nestlé Research Center

PO Box 44

CH-1000 Lausanne 26

Switzerland

Phone (direct): +41 21 785 94 29

Fax: +41 21 785 85 53

E-mail:

esther.campos-gimenez@rdls.nestle.com

Study Monitor

Liaison with SPIFAN/AOAC (Official Methods Board): Sneh Bandhari

Study

Description

The study was divided in two parts: method set up and qualification of

participants (part 1) and multi-laboratory test participation (part 2).

Part 1: method set up and qualification of participants

Each participating laboratory was asked to analyze two practice samples

using the method provided in the protocol and report the results to the Study

Director within the required timelines (6 weeks after receipt). Results within a

range of expected levels qualified the laboratory for the second part of the

study.

Part 2: Multi-Laboratory Test participation

Each qualified laboratory received twenty samples to be analyzed using the

method provided in the protocol. The laboratory was asked to analyze them

on two different days. Each sample was be assigned to either day 1 or day 2.

The results were submitted to the Study Director for evaluation within the

required timelines (6 weeks after receipt).

Continued on next page

AOAC OMB Meeting Book

337