Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  117 / 164 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 117 / 164 Next Page
Page Background

ESTRO SCHOOL

117

- a short CV of the applicant(s) and cost estimates

- after the visit, a 2-page report should be sent to the ESTRO office within one

month of completion (These reports will be posted on the ESTRO website. Every

two months one will be selected for publication in the newsletter).

EVALUATIONMETHODOLOGY

Applications are submitted twice per year and evaluated by a panel of four-five mem-

bers of the Education Council including at least one clinician, physicist, radiation

therapist and biologist.

All applications are scored according to:

• Suitability and likely benefit to the applicants and their home institute.

• Clarity and feasibility of the aims of the visit and methodology described.

These ranking scores are used to assign priority for funding within the available budget.

Applications judged to have potential merit but lacking in focus or methodological details are returned with

advice on how to modify and resubmit the application.

EVALUATION PANEL

Marie-Catherine Vozenin,

Biologist

Martijn Kamphuis,

Radiation Therapist

Håkan Nyström,

Physicist

Sofia Rivera,

Radiation Oncologist

Pedro Carlos Lara Jimenez,

Radiation Oncologist

Applicants according to discipline (may include more than one applicant per proposal)

YEAR

RADIATION

ONCOLOGIST PHYSICIST

RTT

BIOLOGIST

TOTAL

2008

14

9

5

3

31

2009

21

22

8

0

51

2010

22

21

6

0

49

2011

17

11

3

2

33

2012

21

15

8

0

44

2013

33

22

6

0

61

2014

37

28

6

1

72

2015

34

16

6

2

58

2016 (1st semester)

15

9

1

1

26

Total

214

153

49

9

425

Marie-Catherine

Vozenin

TTGChair