Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  154 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 154 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

154

Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits

Although it may be desirable for estate tax purposes, a presumption that the spouse survives

the participant will often produce bad results under the minimum distribution rules. In most cases,

the result of a presumption that the spouse survives in case of simultaneous deaths will be that

benefits must be distributed over the remaining single life expectancy of the spouse, or by the end

of the fifth year after the spouses’ deaths. See

¶ 1.6.03 (

E),

¶ 1.6.05 (

C).

3.2 Spousal Rollover; Election to Treat Decedent’s IRA as

Spouse’s IRA

Thi

s ¶ 3.2

deals with the surviving spouse’s option to roll over, to another retirement plan,

retirement benefits left to her by her deceased spouse (the “participant”).

¶ 2.6

explains what a

rollover is and the rules governing rollovers generally; this

¶ 3.2

discusses additional rules and

considerations that apply to the rollover or Roth conversion of inherited benefits by a surviving

spouse.

When the surviving spouse inherits an IRA or Roth IRA as sole beneficiary, she has the

additional option to elect to treat it as her own; see

¶ 3.2.03 .

In this Chapter, spousal rollover generally means a rollover into the surviving spouse’s

own

retirement plan; for rollover into another

inherited

plan, se

e ¶ 3.2.07 .

3.2.01

Advantages and drawbacks of spousal rollover

The surviving spouse’s ability to roll over inherited benefits to her own retirement plan

gives her a powerful option, not available to other beneficiaries, to defer plan distributions. For

one thing, she escapes a taxable lump sum payout from the plan, if that’s the plan’s only form of

death benefit (see

¶ 1.2.01 ,

#6, and

¶ 1.5.10 )

. Also, by rolling over benefits to her own retirement

plan, the spouse becomes the “participant” or “owner” with regard to those benefits under the

minimum distribution rules. By taking distributions as owner, the surviving spouse gains the

following deferral advantages (A–C) compared with taking the benefits as beneficiary. See “D”

for the drawbacks and reasons NOT to rush into a spousal rollover.

The following discussion assumes the spouse rolls the inherited benefits over into an IRA

in her own name; rollovers into a nonIRA plan are not discussed in this book. For rollovers into

an “inherited” IRA, see

¶ 3.2.07 .

A.

Slower rate of RMDs (longer ADP).

The Applicable Distribution Period (ADP

; ¶ 1.2.03 )

for anyone (even the surviving spouse) who holds inherited benefits as

beneficiary

is the

beneficiary’s

single

life expectancy.

¶ 1.5.03 (

B), (C),

¶ 1.5.04 (

B), (C). Distribution over

the spouse’s life expectancy guarantees that the benefits will be entirely distributed out of

the plan by the time the spouse reaches (or would have reached) her late 80s. In contrast,

the surviving spouse’s RMDs from an IRA she holds as

owner

(participant) are determined

using the Uniform Lifetime Table

( ¶ 1.3.01 )

, under which her ADP is the

joint

life

expectancy of the surviving spouse (as participant) and a hypothetical 10-years-younger

beneficiary. If benefits are left to the spouse outright and rolled over to her own IRA, and

she withdraws only the RMDs required under the Uniform Lifetime Table, the benefits are

guaranteed to outlive the spouse; in fact they will probably be worth more, when she

reaches her late 80s, than they were worth when she inherited the plan!