Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  174 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 174 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

174

Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits

Most significantly for estate planning, in order to be “exempt” from the QJSA/QPSA

requirements, a profit-sharing plan must provide “that the participant’s nonforfeitable accrued

benefit is payable in full, upon the participant’s death, to the participant’s surviving spouse (unless

the participant elects, with spousal consent that satisfies the requirements of section 417(a)(2), that

such benefit be provided instead to a designated beneficiary).” Thus, the only way a profit-sharing

plan can be “exempt” from the QJSA/QPSA requirements is by paying 100 percent of the

participant’s account to the participant’s spouse at the participant’s death unless the spouse

consents to waive this right.

Even though it must offer certain spousal benefits under REA, an exempt profit-sharing

plan is still critically different from a pension plan. Under an exempt profit-sharing plan, the

employee can withdraw ALL his benefits from the plan whenever the plan permits him to do so

(typically, upon separation from service, although some profit-sharing plans permit in-service

distributions) WITHOUT the consent of his spouse. He can then roll the benefits over to an IRA

and continue to enjoy tax deferral without any further obligations to his spouse under federal law

( ¶ 3.4.04 )

.

The trade-off is that, if the employee dies BEFORE having withdrawn the benefits from

the plan, 100 percent of his benefits (including proceeds of any life insurance policy held in the

plan) must be paid to the surviving spouse, unless she has consented to waive this right. Reg.

§ 1.401(a)-20 ,

A-12(b).

3.4.04

IRAs, Roth IRAs, and 403(b) plans

IRAs and Roth IRAs are not subject to REA; neither ERISA § 205 nor IRC

§ 401(a)(11)

applies to IRAs or Roth IRAs (with the possible exception of SEP-IRAs and SIMPLEs, a subject

beyond the scope of this book).

Finally, we come to the special case of 403(b) plans. Although 403(b) plans are subject to

some of the same

§ 401(a)

requirements as qualified plans (see

§ 403(b)(10) , (12) )

,

§ 401(a)(11)

is not one of the 401(a) provisions “imported” into

§ 403(b) ,

which would make it at first appear

that 403(b) plans are not subject to REA. However, even though the tax Code REA provisions

don’t apply,

some

403(b) plans are subject to ERISA—which has its own set of QJSA/QPSA

requirements. Therefore, “to the extent that section 205 [of ERISA] covers section 403(b) contracts

and custodial accounts they are treated as section 401(a) plans” for purposes of the QJSA/QPSA

requirements. Reg

. § 1.401(a)-20 ,

A-3(d). Therefore, some 403(b) plans are subject to REA and

some are not.

The 403(b) plans NOT covered by ERISA (and therefore not subject to REA) are those

funded exclusively by means of elective employee deferrals (salary reduction agreements). 403(b)

plans funded in whole or in part by employer contributions are subject to ERISA and therefore

also to the REA requirements. DOL Reg. § 2510.3-2(f).

403(b) plans that are subject to ERISA and offer annuity benefits to the participant will be

subject to REA’s full QJSA/QPSA requirements, just like a pension plan

( ¶ 3.4.02 )

. A 403(b) plan

that is subject to ERISA but that does

not

offer annuity benefits (

i.e.,

a plan funded exclusively

with mutual fund custodial accounts pursuant to

§ 403(b)(7) )

can use the alternative compliance

procedure available to “exempt” profit-sharing plans

( ¶ 3.4.03 )

.

3.4.05

Various REA exceptions and miscellaneous points