Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  175 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 175 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter 3: Marital Matters

175

There are exceptions to the REA requirements, even for covered plans. These exceptions,

are usually not significant in estate planning, but may be significant in a particular client’s

situation.

For example, no spousal consent is required for distribution of benefits to the participant

when the total value of his benefits is under $5,000. Reg.

§ 1.411(a)-11(c)(3) .

There are modified

rules for ESOPs

( § 401(a)(11)(C) )

and exceptions for certain benefits accrued before REA’s

effective date (1984). No spousal consent is required if “it is established to the satisfaction of a

plan representative that the consent...may not be obtained because there is no spouse, because the

spouse cannot be located ....

§ 417(a)(2)(B) .

Even the “significant” exceptions can be insignificant if the plan negates the exception by

giving the spouse more rights than REA requires, usually for reasons of administrative

convenience. For example, REA does not require that a QPSA, or 100 percent-death-benefit-in-

lieu-of-QPSA, be paid to a spouse who was married to the participant for less than a year prior to

the date of death.

§ 417(d) ; § 401(a)(11)(D) .

However, many retirement plan designers decided it

was easier to grant the same rights to

all

spouses, regardless of the length of the marriage.

Similarly, the value of the legally-required QPSA (which is supposed to be equivalent only

to the survivor pension the spouse would have received under a QJSA) is less than the total value

of the employee’s accrued benefit in the plan. However, some plans simply award every

nonconsenting spouse 100 percent of the value of the participant’s benefit, presumably because

that is administratively easier than figuring out for each individual employee and spouse what

would have been the relative values of their shares under a QJSA.

The spouse loses her REA rights upon divorce or legal separation or her “abandonment”

of the participant. Reg.

§ 1.401(a)-20 ,

A-27. (Instead, she may receive a share of the benefits

through a “qualified domestic relations order” issued in connection with the divorce; se

e § 414(p) .

)

3.4.06

Requirements for spousal consent or waiver

§ 417

and regulations contain elaborate rules that must be complied with in order to have

a valid spousal consent to the participant’s waiver of the QPSA or the QJSA. The IRS has

published sample spousal consent forms. Notice 97-10, 1997-1 C.B. 370.

REA creates serious, and sad, difficulties when a mentally disabled spouse is unable to

consent to the desired estate plan. In that case consent can be provided only by the spouse’s legal

guardian. Reg.

§ 1.401(a)-20 ,

A-27.

The participant’s waiver of a QPSA, and the spouse’s consent to such waiver, must be

given after the beginning of the plan year in which the participant reaches age 35, and prior

to the employee’s death

. § 417(a)(6)(B) .

The IRS, unlike the Code itself, permits waiver of

the QPSA even

before

the participant reaches age 35, provided the participant goes through

the waiver/consent process

again

after reaching age 35. Reg.

§ 1.401(a)-20 ,

A-33.

For exempt profit-sharing plans

( ¶ 3.4.03 )

, the spousal consent for waiver of the 100

percent-death-benefit may be provided “at any time,” including before the participant

reaches age 35. Reg.

§ 1.401(a)-20 ,

A-33(a).