Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  211 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 211 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

Chapter 4: Inherited Benefits: Advising Executors and Beneficiaries

211

Trust beneficiaries can disclaim interests or powers they have under the trust, to help the

trust qualify as a “see-through trust” under the IRS’s minimum distribution trust rules. See

6.3.03 (

B).

B.

Salvaging spousal rollover.

If the participant dies having named the “wrong” beneficiary,

it may be possible to get the benefits to the spouse (so she can roll them over) by having

the named beneficiary disclaim the benefits. This strategy works if, as a result of the

disclaimer, the benefits pass outright to the spouse either as contingent beneficiary, or as

the default beneficiary under the plan

( ¶ 1.7.02 )

.

If the default beneficiary under the plan is the participant’s estate, this strategy still works

if (as a result of the disclaimer) the benefits will pass (through the estate) outright to the spouse as

residuary beneficiary under the participant’s will or by intestacy. Se

e ¶ 3.2.09 .

In PLR 9045050, the participant named a trust as his beneficiary. The spouse was a trustee

of the trust. Upon the participant’s death, the spouse, as trustee, made a qualified disclaimer of the

benefits. As a result of the disclaimer, the benefits passed to the spouse outright rather than to the

trust, and she rolled them over. PLR 1999-13048 (see

¶ 3.2.09 )

was similar.

In PLR 9450041, benefits were redirected from a marital trust to the spouse via a chain of

qualified and nonqualified disclaimers; the rollover was allowed.

In PLR 2005-05030, a participant died without having named a beneficiary for his

retirement plans. The benefits therefore became payable to his estate, which in turn was left to

“Trust #2.” The beneficiaries of Trust #2 were the participant’s spouse, issue, sister, sister’s issue,

sister-in-law, and sister-in-law’s issue. Qualified disclaimers were filed by the spouse, and all the

then-living issue (two daughters and two grandchildren), and by the sister and sister-in-law and

their then-living issue (seven nieces and nephews). As a result of these disclaimers, the trust passed

to the surviving spouse under applicable state law, and the IRS approved the spousal rollover.

C.

Disclaimer by participant’s estate.

When retirement benefits are payable to the

participant’s own estate, the IRS has ruled that the participant’s executor may not disclaim

the benefits because the participant had “accepted” his own retirement benefits

( ¶ 4.4.04 )

.

PLR 9437042.

4.4.12

Double deaths: Disclaimer by beneficiary’s estate

If the beneficiary of a retirement plan dies after becoming entitled to the benefits, the

beneficiary’s executor generally can disclaim the benefits on the beneficiary’s behalf if permitted

by state law. This approach is often useful when a husband and wife die within a short time of each

other, and the first spouse to die named the surviving spouse as primary beneficiary and their

children (or a see-through trust for their children) as contingent beneficiary. The executor of the

now-deceased surviving spouse disclaims the benefits (and any interests granted to the now-

deceased surviving spouse under any trust named as contingent beneficiary) on behalf of the now-

deceased surviving spouse, allowing the benefits to flow directly to the next generation (or to the

trust for the next generation). As a result of the disclaimer, the participant’s original “contingent

beneficiary” becomes the “primary beneficiary,” which often produces better results under the

minimum distribution rules. See PLR 2000-13041 for an example.