Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  76 / 507 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 76 / 507 Next Page
Page Background

76

Life and Death Planning for Retirement Benefits

the spouse’s own IRA). However, the regulations do not discuss grantor trusts and there

are no rulings confirming that the grantor trust rules apply in this context.

C.

Typical QTIP-type trust: spouse is income beneficiary.

If the spouse does not have the

right to demand distribution to herself of

either

(i) the entire amount of the participant’s

retirement benefits payable to the trust (as under a 100% grantor trust; see “B”),

or

(ii)

whatever amounts are distributed from the retirement plan to the trust during her lifetime

(as under a conduit trust; see “A”), the trust is not entitled to

any

of the privileges of the

spouse. A typical example is a QTIP trust, under which the spouse is entitled only to

“income” for life (with or without limited rights to principal). Many “credit shelter trusts”

also fit this model.

Even if such a trust qualifies as a see-through trust

( ¶ 6.2.03 )

, and the spouse’s life

expectancy is the ADP (because she is the oldest beneficiary of the trust

; ¶ 1.5.03 (

D),

¶ 1.5.04 (

D)),

“some amounts distributed from...[the retirement plan] to [the trust] may be accumulated in [the

trust] during [the spouse’s] lifetime for the benefit of [the] remaindermen beneficiaries.” Therefore

the remainder beneficiaries “count” as beneficiaries of the trust, and

the spouse is not the sole

beneficiary of the trust

. Reg.

§ 1.401(a)(9)-5 ,

A-7(c)(3), Example 1(iii). Thus, the delayed

Required Commencement Date (and related rules) o

f § 401(a)(9)(B)(iv) ( ¶ 1.6.04 ¶ 1.6.05 )

do

not

apply to benefits payable to such a trust. The special method of computing the spouse’s life

expectancy

( ¶ 1.6.03 (

D)) does not apply; the life expectancy of the oldest trust beneficiary is

calculated on a fixed-term basis as described at

¶ 1.5.05

. Rev. Rul. 2006-26, 2006-22 IRB 939.

1.7 The Beneficiary and the “

Designated

Beneficiary”

This

¶ 1.7

explains what a “beneficiary” is

( ¶ 1.7.02 )

; the difference between a

“beneficiary” and a “Designated Beneficiary”

( ¶ 1.7.03 )

; the problems when an estate is a

beneficiary

( ¶ 1.7.04 )

; and special rules that apply when there are multiple beneficiaries

( ¶ 1.7.05 ¶ 1.7.06 )

. See

¶ 1.8

for the “separate accounts” rule and how to modify the RMD results after the

participant’s death.

1.7.01

Significance of having a Designated Beneficiary

The valuable income tax deferral permitted under the “life expectancy of the beneficiary”

or “stretch” payout method

( ¶ 1.1.03 ,

¶ 1.5.05

(C)) is available only for retirement plan death

benefits that pass to a Designated Beneficiary. Not every beneficiary is a Designated Beneficiary.

If there is deemed to be no Designated Beneficiary, the payout options (under the applicable “no-

DB rule”) will generally be less favorable than a payout over the life expectancy of an individual

Designated Beneficiary.

Therefore, estate planners must understand the meaning of the term Designated Beneficiary

and in most cases will want to take steps to assure that clients have a Designated Beneficiary so as

to maximize the value of the client’s retirement plans for the benefit of the client’s chosen

beneficiaries. However, there are situations in which it doesn’t matter whether there is a

Designated Beneficiary; see

¶ 6.2.01 .

1.7.02

Who is the participant’s beneficiary?