Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  122 / 648 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 122 / 648 Next Page
Page Background

Safety and environmental standards for fuel storage sites

Final report

120

Table 12 would give a higher level of confidence in the effectiveness of the checking. No figures

for the probability of error are given because these should be determined and justified on a case-

by-case basis by a specialist in human error quantification.

Table 12

Levels of cross-checking effectiveness

Level of dependency Level of checking

Complete

No justifiable reason why the checker should identify the failure when the

person carrying out the original action has not.

High

The checker can determine the correct course of action independently of the

first person. However, checker either has a common link with the first person

or there is good reason to believe that the checker will make the same error as

the first person.

Moderate

Checker has a weak link to the first person or there is moderate likelihood that

the checker will will make the same error as the first person.

Low

Checker has sufficient independence from the person carrying out the original

action and the check is designed to highlight errors that may have occurred.

206

If in doubt, or if a suitable justification cannot be given, no claims should be made

for risk reduction due to checking

.

Annex 7 Incorporating human error in initiating events

Identification of potential human error

207 The first step is to identify which tasks are critical tasks in relation to the overflow event. In

this context, a critical task is one in which human error can trigger a sequence of events leading

to an overflow. The identification of critical tasks is best achieved during the development of a

demand tree, as described in Annex 3.

208 When doing so, there should be coverage of all modes of tank operation: filling, emptying,

maintenance, transfers, and any other abnormal modes of operation etc. A ‘critical (human) task

list’ can then be created. Table 13 shows an example.

Table 13

An example ‘critical (human) task list’

Mode of operation

Task

Potential adverse outcome

Transfers between tanks

Opening manual routing valve

between the transfer pump

discharge and a designated

receiving tank

Opening the wrong valve and thereby

transfer to the tank under review which

has too little ullage and causing the tank

to overflow

Review of each critical task

209 For each critical task it is important to gain a good overview of the task and its context. There

are a number of task analysis techniques that can be used.

Create a timeline with input from a person who does the activity.

Review timeline against operating instructions and process engineering input for anomalies.

Consider creating a hierarchical task analysis for the activity to identify the key tasks.